Return-Path: Received: from web51105.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.147] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with SMTP id 493635 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 22:04:51 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.38.147; envelope-from=prvt_pilot@yahoo.com Message-ID: <20041101030422.60988.qmail@web51105.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.146.250.70] by web51105.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:04:22 PST Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:04:22 -0800 (PST) From: Steve Brooks Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 3000 fpm :-) (unofficially) To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Ed, Actually I have an instrument rating, but the guy who had the Bonaza wasn't current, and I wouldn't want to fly an unfamiliar aircraft in actual IMC. Especially as bad as it was here 1-1/2 vis w/ 500 ft ceiling. Not very good conditions, especially since I haven't flown in actual IMC in 2 years. Not a good place to pick back up. Steve Brooks --- Ed Anderson wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bulent Aliev" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > > Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 4:58 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 3000 fpm :-) (unofficially) > > > > On 10/31/04 3:54 PM, "Ed Anderson" > wrote: > > > > > Hi Steve, good to hear from you. > > > > > > Yes, I always looked at the weather in SC just > to see if I did get off > what > > > it would be like a bit further south. Generally > the fog didn't start to > > > lift until near the Georgia border. > > > > You guys have one year to get your instrument > rating. Last year we had 6 > > rotary powered airplanes. This year two? We are > going backwards? > > Fin is the only one with real coconuts to fly in > even if the tower told > him > > it is IFR (or fly period :) It was a great > gathering as usual and we thank > > Tracy and Laura for the hospitality and Laura's > parents for landing them > > their beautiful house. > > Bulent > > > > Ah! I see we are now using Finn's coconuts as the > standard- are we?. Well, > this old ape is content to let the young ones with > the big coconuts fly in > that kind of weather. Probably why you only see > small coconuts on old apes > {:>) > > Two winters ago I stupidly got myself in situation > (clear Wx was being > reported behind a cold front) flying at 8000 ft and > trying to go over the > tops of a "few clouds". I ended up spending 15-20 > minutes in solid IFR and > ice. Ice formed on the canopy and in front of each > fuel cap on the wing. > Fortunately had pitot heat and remembered to turn it > on before it was too > late. yes, I did the 180 thing but the weather had > build up behind me > quickly. > > Staying on the AI, altimeter and GPS, I was finally > able to get down and > below the weather at 1800 MSL. I finally landed > minus radio antenna (that > the ice took off) just north of Atlanta. The > first thing I saw when I > staggered into the FBO's office through the blowing > snow was an article > posted to their reading board about the average time > a non-instrument rated > pilot lasted in IFR conditions was a few seconds > short of 3 minutes. The > experience and the article was enough to shrink any > oversized coconuts > this old ape may have had. {:>) > > My plane is instrumented for IFR (fortunately) and I > actually completed the > instrument ground school and passed the FAA ground > test just before I > retired. I then decided that there was probably > risk in me completing an > obtaining an IFR rating. If you don't stay current > - I think you are > fooling yourself and just might end up in a > situation beyond your current > capabilities. > > Sorry, I didn't make it and missed seeing all you > folks that did, but hope > to make it next year. Now if Tracy got a GPS > approach for Shady Bend {:>) > > Best Regards > > Ed Anderson. > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: > http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >