Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #12398
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] TWM MAP measurement
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:31:47 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message

Maybe you’re comparing apples and cherimoyas. 

After a brief Google search, I now know what a cherimoya is.

Measuring MAP at the downstream end of the TB “runners” is different than measuring out in the air plenum before any losses.  It is difficult to believe there is 4” drop, but until we have some other measurements, we don’t know for sure.  On my dyno runs I also measured 26” at 6200 WOT.

As I understand it, the ideal situation would be to have a TB, that feeds into an air plenum, then individual runners from there to the engine.  It sounds like the only place you can get a true, overall MAP reading is in the air plenum itself.  I'm guessing that it's difficult to get a good reading in the TB bore, due to the speed the air is moving.  Trying to sense the MAP after a restriction (downwind end of the runners) will be a different, but still interesting MAP reading. 
 
It seems to me that the gold standard of MAP readings almost requires a reading to be taken in the plenum, and only then will it conform to the expected 30" at WOT.  My theory is that our TWM readings are perfectly usable for tuning, and as a reference number, but will never see 30" at WOT due to the construction of the port, and velocity of the air inside the TB.   I could certainly be wrong, and I'd love to pick up an extra 4" MAP, but I can't see that happening. 

What is the orientation of your TB – MAP line coming off the top of the TB or off the bottom?

Port off the top. 

Cheers,
Rusty
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster