Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 485228 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:57:52 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.73; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20041025005721.SNJP18843.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:57:21 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: oil cooler duct suggestion Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:57:42 -0500 Message-ID: <016a01c4ba2d$a1c7b150$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_016B_01C4BA03.B8F1A950" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_016B_01C4BA03.B8F1A950 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Could be the airflow is not the main culprit - but, since Rusty is = somewhat committed? to the core {:>), I figure we'd help him work that side of = the equation for a bit - then if we (he) can't get the improvement he would like, he may have to consider other alternatives (like a stock core). =20 Hey, quit talking about me like I'm not here :-)=20 =20 I refuse to believe the stock core is all that special. I do know that = I can't fit the long stock 2nd gen core, but could possibly fit a 3rd gen core. I doubt one of those would be enough though. I'm sure the evap = core will be just fine, once I get the airflow straightened out (get it, straightened... never mind). I could do unlimited climbs at 90 mph an = 90+ degrees F before I went to the C drive, so the extra power is what's = causing me problems. Even now, I'm probably only 15 degrees away from being = able to climb at will. If necessary, I still have the Setrab cooler that I used = in an earlier revision, and I'm sure that will do the job. It might even = fit. =20 Cheers, Rusty =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_016B_01C4BA03.B8F1A950 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Could be the airflow is not the main culprit - but, = since Rusty=20 is somewhat committed? to the core {:>), I figure we'd help him work = that=20 side of the equation for a bit - then if we (he) can't get the = improvement he=20 would like, he may have to consider other alternatives (like a stock=20 core).

 
Hey, = quit talking about=20 me like I'm not here :-) 
 
I refuse = to=20 believe the stock core is all that special.  I do know that I = can't=20 fit the long stock 2nd gen core, but could possibly fit a 3rd gen = core.  I=20 doubt one of those would be enough though.  I'm sure the evap core = will be=20 just fine, once I get the airflow straightened out (get it, = straightened...=20 never mind).   I could do unlimited climbs at 90 mph an 90+ = degrees F=20 before I went to the C drive, so the extra power is what's causing me=20 problems.  Even now, I'm probably only 15 degrees away from being = able to=20 climb at will.  If necessary, I still have the Setrab cooler that I = used in=20 an earlier revision, and I'm sure that will do the job.  It might = even=20 fit.  
 
Cheers,
Rusty
 
 
 



 ------=_NextPart_000_016B_01C4BA03.B8F1A950--