Return-Path: Received: from [216.52.245.18] (HELO ispwestemail2.mdeinc.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 485113 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:42:03 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.52.245.18; envelope-from=wschertz@ispwest.com Received: from 7n7z201 (unverified [67.136.145.219]) by ispwestemail2.mdeinc.com (Vircom SMTPRS 3.2.315.0) with SMTP id for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:41:30 -0700 Message-ID: <012901c4ba12$31c44320$e9918843@7n7z201> From: "William" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: oil cooler duct suggestion Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:41:15 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Ed, A third part of the equation is that the evaporator core may not function very well as an 'oil' cooler, because it lacks the turbulence generators in the oil flow passages. If the air temperature rise is low (20F you speculated) I would look at the oil side of the equation. Bill Schertz KIS Cruiser # 4045 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 9:03 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: oil cooler duct suggestion > All good points, Bernie > > My impression is that Rusty 1st objective is he would like for the oil > temps to be lower. Assuming that the GM core, Rusty is using for an oil > cooler provides adequate air/metal contact area, then it would appear to me > that the problem at this time is getting more cooling effectiveness from the > airflow. If you have adequate mass flow through the core, you will cool. > However, if you have not adequately slowed the air down (diffusion) then > your cooling drag could be higher than necessary. But, it would appear to > me at this point that cooling is the crucial aspect rather than minimizing > cooling drag. Tight 90 deg turns right before the core does not promote > more flow through the core (in my opinion). > > According to K&W (if I understood the math), the more parallel the flow is > to the core surface at entry to the core the greater the pressure loss is > and the less cooling effectiveness. They mention that in these cases the > use of guide vans to direct the airflow more directly into the core passages > can result in cooling effectiveness approaching the straight-in duct. They > also point out that staggering the core layers of the heat exchanger can > also help (not feasible in this case). > > There appears to be two situations possible: > > 1. There is adequate air mass flow to cool - but the system is not > transferring the heat to the air with the best efficiency. In this case, > better diffusion offers improvement. > > 2. There is not have adequate air mass flow to cool - in this case, it does > not matter how effective you diffuser is, your system will not cool > adequately. > > So either situation could apply in Rusty's case. > > If the delta T of the cooling air across the core is in the vicinity of > 40-50F then I would estimate that he has adequate diffusion but perhaps not > adequate air mass flow to cool. In other words, the system is transferring > the coolant heat to the air with high efficiency - but, simply not enough > air to carry away adequate heat. > > If the Delta T is closer to 20F then he may have sufficient air mass flow > but inadequate diffusion (does not slow the air down enough for maximum heat > transfer) > > Even with the best diffuser a system will not adequately cool if there is > inadequate mass flow through the core. So my focus would be 1st focused on > increasing the mass flow. Just my opinion, of course. > > Ed Anderson > > > > > > Rusty and Ed, > > > > Ed, maybe you know more about his configuration than what I can glean from > his schetches. I think we need to know whether he is trying to almost > totally diffuse the air like mine (hopefully :>) ) to minimize the turning > pressure loss and allow the flow to accelerate thru the cooler or whether he > is trying to do the Lamar type min height and volume flow path. > > > > Rusty, what is the x-cross maximum area perpendicular to the cooler > compared to the inlet area? > > > > Boy the weather looks like it should be good on Wed for your flight down > Ed. Rusty, really sorry you aren't going to make it next weekend, I really > want to meet the guy behind all these emails. > > > > Bernie > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html