Return-Path: Received: from outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com ([64.136.20.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with SMTP id 484688 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:27:57 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.20.164; envelope-from=jbker@juno.com Received: from outbound21-sr.nyc.untd.com (webmail25.nyc.untd.com [10.141.27.165]) by smtpout04.nyc.untd.com with SMTP id AABAZZH58A4USTYA for (sender ); Sun, 24 Oct 2004 05:26:38 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: Y+Mfppm2QyGfnY/dq+iW1WWZ+JTMhiy8XI/qOqB8Y2LCQ2Oc8ZKctA== Received: (from jbker@juno.com) by webmail25.nyc.untd.com (jqueuemail) id KAP5GGNS; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 05:26:07 PDT Received: from [4.234.135.43] by webmail25.nyc.untd.com with HTTP: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:26:06 GMT X-Originating-IP: [4.234.135.43] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "jbker@juno.com" Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:26:06 GMT To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] oil cooler duct suggestion X-Mailer: WebMail Version 2.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20041024.052607.552.51274@webmail25.nyc.untd.com> X-ContentStamp: 2:2:215598499 Rusty and Ed, Ed, maybe you know more about his configuration than what I can glean from his schetches. I think we need to know whether he is trying to almost totally diffuse the air like mine (hopefully :>) ) to minimize the turning pressure loss and allow the flow to accelerate thru the cooler or whether he is trying to do the Lamar type min height and volume flow path. Rusty, what is the x-cross maximum area perpendicular to the cooler compared to the inlet area? Boy the weather looks like it should be good on Wed for your flight down Ed. Rusty, really sorry you aren't going to make it next weekend, I really want to meet the guy behind all these emails. Bernie