Return-Path: Received: from mail.tsisp.com ([65.23.108.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP-TLS id 481368 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:49:14 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.23.108.44; envelope-from=prvt_pilot@yahoo.com Received: from stevehome by mail.tsisp.com (Technical Support Inc.) with SMTP id CQA74584 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:48:42 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Steve Brooks" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling version 2.2 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:49:48 -0400 Message-ID: <006c01c4b75b$b152ff50$6400a8c0@workgroup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Bill, Actually, where the scoops are located, they are outside of the fuselage, and the only thing in front of them are the wing strakes. I didn't measure from the strake leading edge to the scoop inlet, but I would estimate that it is between 3 to 4 feet. I guess that would mean that there is a boundary layer of about .6 to .8 inches present at that location. If the boundary layer air becomes an issue, I will either put a small air dam ahead of the scoop, or as I did with the NACA, install a vortex generator ahead of the scoop. I thought that I might have a photo that shows the scoop in relation to the wing, but looking at the ones that I took, none really show it very well. Regards, Steve -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Bill Dube Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 8:19 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling version 2.2 At 05:55 PM 10/20/2004 -0400, you wrote: >Attached are a couple of photos of my lower cowling. It is minus 2 small >armpit scoops, and plus 2 larger scoops. I notice that these scoops include the boundary layer with the air they scoop in. Isn't this a problem, especially near the fuselage? The boundary layer grows at something like a 0.2 inch per foot of length. This rule of thumb would imply that you would need to space the side of the scoop about 3 to 4 inches from the fuselage. The upper lip should be something like 1.5 inches off the underside of the wing. If you don't space the scoop away from the surface of the airplane, you create a lot of drag and you don't take in much air. Perhaps there is some key point I'm missing. >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html