Return-Path: Received: from tomcat.al.noaa.gov ([140.172.240.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 480987 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:19:09 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=140.172.240.2; envelope-from=bdube@al.noaa.gov Received: from PILEUS.al.noaa.gov (pileus.al.noaa.gov [140.172.241.195]) by tomcat.al.noaa.gov (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id i9L0Icbe027968 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:18:38 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20041020175951.0271b278@mailsrvr.al.noaa.gov> X-Sender: bdube@mailsrvr.al.noaa.gov X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:18:48 -0600 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: Bill Dube Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Cooling version 2.2 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 05:55 PM 10/20/2004 -0400, you wrote: >Attached are a couple of photos of my lower cowling. It is minus 2 small >armpit scoops, and plus 2 larger scoops. I notice that these scoops include the boundary layer with the air they scoop in. Isn't this a problem, especially near the fuselage? The boundary layer grows at something like a 0.2 inch per foot of length. This rule of thumb would imply that you would need to space the side of the scoop about 3 to 4 inches from the fuselage. The upper lip should be something like 1.5 inches off the underside of the wing. If you don't space the scoop away from the surface of the airplane, you create a lot of drag and you don't take in much air. Perhaps there is some key point I'm missing.