Return-Path: Received: from [65.54.241.208] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.3) with ESMTP id 431113 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:56:49 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.241.208; envelope-from=lors01@msn.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.168.111]) by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:56:13 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:56:12 -0700 Received: from 65.137.51.46 by bay3-dav7.bay3.hotmail.com with DAV; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:55:43 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [65.137.51.46] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] X-Sender: lors01@msn.com From: "Tracy Crook" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 problem Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:55:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0060_01C4A24E.F254A980" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.10.0006.2205 Seal-Send-Time: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:55:43 -0400 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2004 19:56:12.0231 (UTC) FILETIME=[8AD29570:01C4A270] Return-Path: lors01@msn.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0060_01C4A24E.F254A980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That would be mode 1. -100 would not be unusual for an idle MAP = correction. Tracy ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mark Steitle=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:46 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 problem John, I was afraid someone would ask that. Its been so long ago, and I don' = have the EC-2 instructions with me, I can't tell you what mode it was. = (I could look it up when I get home from work later today) I do = remember the instructions stating that you could adjust a max of +/- 127 = steps. There is a second method of adjustment if you need more than = that. I was very surprised that I had to go as far as I did to get it = to idle properly, with the mixture knob centered in the 12 o'clock = position at the same time. I'm sure I'll have to some more tweaking = when I can actually load the engine. (Tracy mentions that you shouldn't = even attempt tuning without a load on the engine... Oops, sorry Tracy.) = Mark S. At 10:17 AM 9/24/2004 -0400, you wrote: >I had to change my map settings to about -100 steps=20 Mark. Please elaborate. -100 steps in what mode? Regards, John ------=_NextPart_000_0060_01C4A24E.F254A980 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That would be mode 1.  -100 would not be unusual for an = idle MAP=20 correction.
 
Tracy
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Steitle
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Sent: Friday, September 24, = 2004 10:46=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2=20 problem

John,
I was afraid someone would ask=20 that.  Its been so long ago, and I don' have the EC-2 = instructions with=20 me, I can't tell you what mode it was.  (I could look it up when = I get=20 home from work later today)  I do remember the instructions = stating that=20 you could adjust a max of +/- 127 steps.  There is a second = method of=20 adjustment if you need more than that.  I was very surprised that = I had=20 to go as far as I did to get it to idle properly, with the mixture = knob=20 centered in the 12 o'clock position at the same time.  I'm sure = I'll have=20 to some more tweaking when I can actually load the engine.  = (Tracy=20 mentions that you shouldn't even attempt tuning without a load on the=20 engine... Oops, sorry Tracy.) 

Mark S.


At = 10:17 AM=20 9/24/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>I had to change = my map=20 settings to about -100 steps
Mark.
Please elaborate. -100 = steps in=20 what mode?
Regards, = John
------=_NextPart_000_0060_01C4A24E.F254A980--