Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.241.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.2) with ESMTP id 420967 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:38:03 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.35; envelope-from=rogersda@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.52]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with SMTP id <20040919033732.DZLQ27713.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:37:32 -0400 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: Dale Rogers To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine start Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:37:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040919033732.DZLQ27713.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> > > A static voltage check most likely would find that. It will only > > show up when working current is flowing > Hmmm. I thought of putting a load on each circuit - like a car headlamp to > see if it glows dimly. Ack! Typing fingers outran brain. I meant to say ~most likely would not find~, but it looks like you got my intended meaning. > It really feels like it's running on one rotor. How would that be different from, say, one pair of coils swapped, or one pair of injectors crossed? Wouldn't it think it was firing (or spraying) one rotor, when it was actually doing the other - at the wrong time, of course? Dale R.