Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.241.38] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.1) with ESMTP id 408091 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 22:23:05 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.38; envelope-from=daveleonard@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.57]) by fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with SMTP id <20040913022233.QJXQ12732.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 22:22:33 -0400 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: high oil pressure and coolers Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 22:22:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040913022233.QJXQ12732.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> David, I think you are largely correct. My oil cooler is also very well fed. I'm at work all night and don't have the pictures, but you can see them on my web site. http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/vp4skydoc/index.html Dave Leonard > Dave, > > Do you have photo(s) of your oil cooler and how air is ducted to it? Ed's > initial problem was a duct that blasted most air thru one end of long cooler > and rest wasn't getting its "share" of air. > > I'm thinking "duct" is more important than "Setrab" or "Mazda" or "A/C > core". > > David