Return-Path: Received: from mail.tsisp.com ([65.23.108.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.1) with ESMTP-TLS id 401360 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 18:44:51 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.23.108.44; envelope-from=steve@tsisp.com Received: from stevehome by mail.tsisp.com (Technical Support Inc.) with SMTP id CQA74584 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 18:44:20 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Steve Brooks" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: high oil pressure and coolers Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 18:46:30 -0400 Message-ID: <00b001c4952c$852683d0$6400a8c0@WORKGROUP.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B1_01C4950A.FE14E3D0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00B1_01C4950A.FE14E3D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rusty, Yes my oil temperature was high, which is why I redesigned it to improve both water and oil cooling. I don't think though that the oil cooler was the cause of the high temperatures, but rather being overly optimistic about making air go around corners. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Russell Duffy Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 6:05 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: high oil pressure and coolers If you really want to run the evaporator core as your oil cooler, why don't you move the oil filter upstream of the cooler. That would reduce the pressure to the cooler, and also eliminate some downstream restriction. I could do that, but not all that easily. At the moment, the evap core isn't doing the job anyway, so it's probably not worth the effort to try to save it. The other option to lower the primary pressure is to install an aftermarket regulator on the oil outlet at the front cover. Bruce said you could also take off the front cover, and modify the original regulator spring to lower the pressure to about 110 psi. I don't plan to do either of those, but they are options. Steve Brooks (running the stock oil cooler) Weren't your oil temps way up there? For some reason, (note to Bill Dube) I was convinced that the stock cooler wasn't going to work well enough, which is why I went with the evap core. I don't think I've heard John complain about his oil temp (everything else... ). How many people are running stock 2nd or 3rd gen coolers, and have temps under 210? Sadly, ------=_NextPart_000_00B1_01C4950A.FE14E3D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Rusty,

Yes my oil temperature was high, which is why I redesigned it to = improve both water and oil cooling.  = I don’t think though that the oil cooler was the cause of the high temperatures, = but rather being overly optimistic about making air go around = corners.

 

Steve

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Russell Duffy
Sent: Tuesday, September = 07, 2004 6:05 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = high oil pressure and coolers

 

If you really want to run the evaporator core = as your oil cooler, why don’t you move the oil filter upstream of the = cooler.  That would reduce the pressure = to the cooler, and also eliminate some downstream = restriction. <= /p>

 <= /p>

I could do that, but not all that easily.  At the moment, the evap core isn't doing the job = anyway, so it's probably not worth the effort to try to save = it.  <= /p>

 <= /p>

The other option to lower the = primary pressure is to install an aftermarket regulator on the oil outlet = at the front cover.  Bruce said you could also take off the front = cover, and modify the original regulator spring to lower the pressure to about 110 psi.  I don't plan to do either of those, but they are options.  <= /p>

 <= /p>

Steve Brooks (running the stock oil = cooler) <= /p>

 <= /p>

Weren't your oil temps way up there?  For some reason, (note to Bill Dube) I was convinced = that the stock cooler wasn't going to work well enough, which is why I went with = the evap core.  I don't think I've heard John complain about his oil = temp (everything else... <G>).  <= /p>

 <= /p>

How many people are running stock = 2nd or 3rd gen coolers, and have temps under = 210?  <= /p>

 <= /p>

Sadly,  <= /span><= /p>

------=_NextPart_000_00B1_01C4950A.FE14E3D0--