Return-Path: Received: from mail.tsisp.com ([65.23.108.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.1) with ESMTP-TLS id 401192 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 16:22:27 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.23.108.44; envelope-from=steve@tsisp.com Received: from stevehome by mail.tsisp.com (Technical Support Inc.) with SMTP id CQA74584 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 16:21:56 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Steve Brooks" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Water pump problem Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:23:47 -0400 Message-ID: <008f01c49518$9522dc20$6400a8c0@WORKGROUP.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0090_01C494F7.0E113C20" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C494F7.0E113C20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Looks like I’ll have to pull the cores, and drill through the blocking plate. That would have been a much easier job before the AN-16 bungs were welded on, but I can still get a ¾” hole saw through the opening, so it should be possible. That should work fine, and at least it explains why it's acting the way it is. Good thing you didn't try to fly it that way. You are to be applauded for being cautious, and observant. I heard a saying a long time ago that stated “its better to be down here wishing you were flying, than to be up there wishing that you were on the ground” or something to that effect. I’ll fly with some things not at 100%, but not anything engine related. (or wings, controls, brakes, and several other required items) Do you know what vehicle those cores came from? I know the Chevy Caprice cores from 77-90 do not have any sort of dividers in the tanks. Here's my favorite evap core page- http://www.frigidair.net/Parts/product_EV.html One was for a 1990 Camaro IROC Z28. The other for a 1995 Corvette. These were new cores, but I think were aftermarket or OEM. The boxes did not say AC Delco on them. They seem to be very well made, but obviously with at least one exception with the block in the one tank on each core. Regards, Steve ------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C494F7.0E113C20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

 

Looks like I’ll have to pull the cores, = and drill through the blocking plate.  = That would have been a much easier job before the AN-16 bungs were welded on, = but I can still get a =BE” hole saw through the opening, so it should be = possible.

 

 <= /p>

That should work fine, and at = least it explains why it's acting the way it is.  Good thing you = didn't try to fly it that way.   You are to be applauded for being cautious, and observant.  <= /p>

 =

I heard a saying a long time ago that stated “its better to = be down here wishing you were flying, than to be up there wishing that you were on = the ground” or something to that effect.  I’ll fly with some things not at 100%, but not anything = engine related.  (or wings, controls, brakes, = and several other required items)

 

 

 <= /p>

Do you know what vehicle those = cores came from?  I know the Chevy Caprice cores from 77-90 do = not have any sort of dividers in the tanks.  Here's my = favorite evap core page- http://www.frigid= air.net/Parts/product_EV.html<= /p>

 <= /p>

One was for a 1990 Camaro IROC Z28.  The other for a 1995 Corvette.  These were new cores, but I think were aftermarket or OEM.  The boxes did not = say AC Delco on them.  They seem = to be very well made, but obviously with at least one exception with the block in = the one tank on each core.

 

Regards,

Steve

 <= /p>

------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C494F7.0E113C20--