Return-Path: Received: from smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.168.185] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with SMTP id 395919 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:02:49 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.163.168.185; envelope-from=dcarter@datarecall.net Received: from unknown (HELO Davidscmptr) (dcarter11@sbcglobal.net@216.63.106.150 with login) by smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Sep 2004 03:02:18 -0000 Message-ID: <089501c49486$fd27f7c0$6401a8c0@Davidscmptr> Reply-To: "David Carter" From: "David Carter" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine Vent Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 22:01:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 That plumbing back to the intake is standard. It is also "standard" (per one of Murphey's laws) that the rubber hose will harden with age, then crack and leak, causing BIG vacuum leak and rough running until you find the problem. Looks like everyone missed ___?'s feedback - told how he'd used a clear plastic line that had a drain valve on end - he'd collect a bit of oil and drain it. Then he put a smaller piece of tubing on the engine and put its "bottom/open" end inside the original/larger dia tube (which was no longer hooked up to the engine at top, just open to the air) and never had any more oil show up - the engine was able to "breath" in the space between the walls of the two tubes. I think folks should try to duplicate his results and hope that can be the "standard". David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Christley" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 7:52 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine Vent > Ed Anderson wrote: > > Good point, Dave. > > > > I failed to state that I have an air/oil separator which returns the oil to > > the sump but dumps the combustion byproduct gases overboard. > > > > Ed > > > > I was under the hood of my Mom's Ford today. I took notice that the > vent was plumbed back to the intake after the throttle. I'd never have > thought about it except for this thread. > > Why wouldn't you plumb it back to the intake since it is a low pressure > area (post throttle), and it'll never make a mess there since it'll get > pulled back in and burned? > > -- > http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ > "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, > alleviated by information and experience." > Veeduber > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >