Return-Path: Received: from mail.tsisp.com ([65.23.108.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP-TLS id 395799 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 20:15:23 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.23.108.44; envelope-from=steve@tsisp.com Received: from stevehome by mail.tsisp.com (Technical Support Inc.) with SMTP id CQA74584 for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 20:14:51 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Steve Brooks" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Water pump problem Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 20:16:58 -0400 Message-ID: <003a01c4946f$fdda2830$6400a8c0@WORKGROUP.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003B_01C4944E.76C88830" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C4944E.76C88830 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Rusty, No. It had one tube in each of the tanks. Both in the top. One tank is blocked off by a plate about 2” down from the top. The other tank originally had a tube in it internally that extended to within an inch or so of the bottom. Does that make sense ? Steve -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Russell Duffy Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 7:10 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Water pump problem Don’t all cores have these plates ? These are GM evaporator cores, though the size varies by a ¼” they are pretty close to the same size. Both had the tubes on each end coming out of the top, which is why I went with these particular ones. OK, we may be talking about two different cores. Mine have a tank on each side, with one tube in each tank. Some cores have both tubes coming out of the same tank, so I suppose that tank must be internally divided, and one tube run to each partition of that tank. It sounds like this may be the way yours was. Is that correct? Were both tubes originally coming out of the same tank? Rusty (going to attempt the o-ring grooves now) ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C4944E.76C88830 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Rusty,

No.  It had one = tube in each of the tanks.  Both in the top.   One tank is = blocked off by a plate about 2” down from the top.  The other tank originally had a tube in it internally that = extended to within an inch or so of the bottom.

 

Does that make sense ?

 

Steve

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Russell Duffy
Sent: Monday, September = 06, 2004 7:10 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Water pump problem

 

Don’t all cores have these plates ?  These are GM evaporator cores, = though the size varies by a =BC” they are pretty close to the same = size.  Both had the tubes on each end = coming out of the top, which is why I went with these particular = ones. <= /p>

 <= /p>

OK, we may be talking about = two different cores.  Mine have a tank on each = side, with one tube in each tank.  Some cores have both tubes coming out of = the same tank, so I suppose that tank must be internally divided, and one = tube run to each partition of that tank.  It sounds like this may be the way = yours was.  Is that correct?  Were both tubes originally coming out = of the same tank?  <= /p>

 <= /p>

Rusty (going to attempt the o-ring = grooves now) 

 

 

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C4944E.76C88830--