Return-Path: Received: from mail.tsisp.com ([65.23.108.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP-TLS id 395645 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 16:23:39 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.23.108.44; envelope-from=steve@tsisp.com Received: from stevehome by mail.tsisp.com (Technical Support Inc.) with SMTP id CQA74584 for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 16:23:08 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Steve Brooks" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Water pump problem Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 16:25:05 -0400 Message-ID: <001f01c4944f$99507290$6400a8c0@WORKGROUP.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Jesse, That probably depends upon the design of the core. In my case it had to have both inlet and outlet on top of the core. The cores I used also had both fitting on top. Probably explains why they had a tube inside the core on one end though. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of jesse farr Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 3:39 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Water pump problem Isn't it usually more sensible to run coolant in either top or bottom of condensor/cooler and exhaust out of other end, just to sort of eliminate these kind of problems ? jesse farr ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Brooks" > I'm not getting enough flow to force coolant through > the entire core. It's taking the path of least resistance which is the > upper potion of the core. >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html