Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP id 395515 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 15:39:53 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.198.39; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com Received: from farrhome (pcp04959909pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net[68.59.199.44]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004090619391601500sihq8e>; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 19:39:21 +0000 Message-ID: <002f01c49449$2ee3a1d0$777ba8c0@farrhome> From: "jesse farr" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Water pump problem Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 15:39:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Isn't it usually more sensible to run coolant in either top or bottom of condensor/cooler and exhaust out of other end, just to sort of eliminate these kind of problems ? jesse farr ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Brooks" > I'm not getting enough flow to force coolant through > the entire core. It's taking the path of least resistance which is the > upper potion of the core.