Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.103] (HELO ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP id 393561 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 04 Sep 2004 23:07:54 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from EDWARD (cpe-069-132-183-211.carolina.rr.com [69.132.183.211]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i852GMSH026050 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 22:16:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000a01c492ee$595a5320$2402a8c0@EDWARD> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine Vent Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 22:16:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Good point, Dave. I failed to state that I have an air/oil separator which returns the oil to the sump but dumps the combustion byproduct gases overboard. Ed Ed Anderson RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004 10:07 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine Vent > > > > > > > > > Hi Perry, > > > > > > I return mine to the sump, but a few drops in the intake shouldn't > > hurt > > > any either > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > Ed Anderson > > > RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered > > > Matthews, NC > > Ed, dosen't that defeat the purpose of having an engine vent? > > Dave Leonard > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >