Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP id 389885 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 10:42:14 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.29; envelope-from=rogersda@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.52]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with SMTP id <20040902144136.YBXY21895.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:41:36 -0400 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: Dale Rogers To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: foam-sicle (new ducts) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:41:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040902144136.YBXY21895.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> > From: "Marvin Kaye" > Date: 2004/09/01 Wed PM 07:50:14 EDT > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" ... > The term "BID" simply stands for bi-directional, and defines the cloth as > being woven with warp & weave at 90 degrees to each other. This is in > contrast to "uni" (unidirectional) type cloth in which just about all of the > threads run in one direction, with single threads at 90 degrees every several > inches just to keep the primary ones intact. Ummm, Marv, What you gave is the description of "plain weave". Rutan "BID" (RA7725) is not a plain weave. It consists of paired strands of yarn crossing under/over crosswise pairs of yarn. That's enough to make a major difference in the way the fabric "drapes". It's like comparing gingham to challis. Dale R. COZY MkIV #1254 As for weights, you can find > much lighter fiberglass cloth at the local hobby shop, with material down into > the 1/2oz range. For what you're doing, you would probably be well served > with some 2oz next to the mold, overlaid with several plies of 6 oz to add > strength to the exterior and the overall structure. FWIW.... > > > > > Since there are two ducts, you can surmise that I decided not to add another > scoop to the cowl. I'm going to have one as an air box on the TB, with the > air horns inside. The other goes on the bottom of the right radiator, where > the old hoses attached. By the time I'm done, there will be about a 12 sq > in opening in the radiator duct where the new inlet duct will be added. The > two new ducts will be joined by 3" ID tubing, CEET for now, perhaps > something smooth walled later. 3" is just HUGE though, so it's hard to > imagine there will be any restriction now. I may not get quite as much ram > air effect as I could with a dedicated scoop, but this system give me the > option of adding a scoop in a convenient location later, while still using > the air box that I'm making. > > Cheers, > Rusty (Frances turn North now) > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >