|
|
I know that certified engine installations will use both. Yes, its true that steel resists fatiuge better. But that does not mean it is the only option, or even the best one. I would think that in going from an aluminimum case to an aluminum flared tube, an alum. fitting would be optimal in most cases.
I have alum. fittings on my drive, and in most places in my plane. Heck thats what comes in the kit. :-)
Dave Leonard
Messageplease don't take this as being critical, I'm just asking - is it true or not that engine fittings should be steel, not aluminum? or is that just a myth? does aluminum fatigue faster than steel? what do certified piston planes use?
Kevin Lane Portland, OR
e-mail-> n3773@comcast.net
web-> http://home.comcast.net/~n3773
(browse w/ internet explorer)
----- Original Message ----- From: Russell Duffy To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 5:53 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Sorry Rusty - no bind
Sorry to disappoint you, Rusty (actually, not sorry at all {:>)). Neither am I. Actually, I wish you'd hurry up and get that dang thing running. I could've sworn you were retired... :-) I am sure I am to plug the center hole of (the rear drain hole of the 2.17). But, to make certain I have sent Tracy and e mail to confirm it. Better than finding out in the air I was wrong {:>)
I believe you're right, and you might not get an answer from him since he's on vacation. I'll attach a few pics, for your amusement. One shows the bottom of both drives. The drain holes on the C drive are of course behind the tape. The other two pics show the B, and C drives for comparison. Cheers,
Rusty (sometime before I retire Ed <g>) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|