X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:10:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.63] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTP id 5038837 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:29:53 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.63; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=EsL4x/OzfAZKPwtUwpFxoi9pleaBYM61caG+00CbmSkPAPr060krFl0fAYcQrkf+; h=Received:From:Content-Type:Subject:Date:Message-Id:To:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [64.223.166.158] (helo=[192.168.1.24]) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1QcPja-0007uD-Hr for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:29:18 -0400 From: Colyn Case Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-948-453276438 Subject: fuel vent check valves more measurements - are they worth it? X-Original-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:29:18 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <81ECCE0E-7663-426F-8A82-41984376DA92@earthlink.net> X-Original-To: "lml@lancaironline.net List" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da940ae4208ea343b3608ba6953913670f337350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 64.223.166.158 --Apple-Mail-948-453276438 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I've completed my marginally scientific tests on the Andair fuel check = valves part number ck250E-B. Summary: bleed rate is too slow to balance the pressure in the tank by = about 2:1 in a max rate climb. If you fixed that the bleed function could still cut your spillage as = the result of a taxi turn or a short taxi across a slanted ramp by a factor of 78:1. Of course it would have no = effect on the result of leaving your airplane parked in the sun or on a slanted ramp. The introduction of the check valve does increase the risk of blockage = in either direction. Details. Measurements I measured the time to fully inflate a 5 quart baggy (by blowing into = it) and came up with these numbers. I don't like the taste of gasoline = so I used water instead of gas for the liquid tests. I realize = viscosity differences could significantly change these results. bleed rate of air: .82 cups/second. =20 bleed rate of water: .00159 cups/second unrestricted flow rate of water: not less than .25 cups/second. Climb pressurization problem=20 Then, suppose you climb at 2000 fpm to fl200 and one 51 gallon wing tank = is empty. That will take you 10 minutes. The density of air is about half what it is on the ground so you will = have to move a maximum of 51 gallons of air (albeit less dens air as you = go). =20 time to bleed 51 gallons of air: (51*16)/.82 =3D 995 seconds or 19.9 = minutes. best case climb time to fl200 =3D 10 minutes. flow rate must be increased 2x to insure pressure inside the tank is = always balanced to ambient. Fixing it You can increase the air bleed rate by drilling a couple more small = holes in the bleeder side of the mechanism. This will increase the liquid bleed rate. I think this is a non-linear = function but taking the worst case linear result, that would yield = .00318 cups/second liquid flow rate. max water (standing in for fuel) that could be dumped in a 5 second turn = =3D .0159 cups unrestricted 1.25 cups max fuel that could be dumped in a 20 second taxi =3D .0636 cups unrestricted =3D 5 cups Risk of blockage The check valve mechanism has two extremely small (about 1mm) holes in = the bleed direction and 8 approximately 1/8" holes in the normal flow = direction. The modification I envision would add two more 1mm holes in = the bleed direction. I think there is very little risk of blockage = (beyond that of the vent tube itself) in the normal flow direction. In = the bleed direction, if your tank had a lot of granules on order 1mm in = size, and they managed to find their way to the vent tube, and they all = gathered on the bleed outlet at once, you could get blockage in the = bleed direction. However, that piece moves when the flow changes back = to normal so that blockage of the bleed holes would not affect inward = flow. Conclusion If you have these valves installed, you might want to consider = modification or removal. If you are considering modifying these valves and adding them to your = vent system the tradeoff is as follows: In exchange for adding a risk of blockage in the bleed direction you = reduce taxi spillages from not much to nearly nothing. Spillage due to = fuel expansion or parking on a slanted ramp will be about the same with = or without the valve installed. --Apple-Mail-948-453276438 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

Conclusion

If you have these valves installed, you might want to consider = modification or removal.
If you are considering modifying = these valves and adding them to your vent system the tradeoff is as = follows:
In exchange for adding a risk of blockage in the = bleed direction you reduce taxi spillages from not much to nearly = nothing.  Spillage due to fuel expansion or parking on a slanted = ramp will be about the same with or without the valve = installed.



= = --Apple-Mail-948-453276438--