X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:35:32 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da06.mx.aol.com ([205.188.169.203] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTP id 5027860 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:15:22 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.169.203; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from imo-da02.mx.aol.com (imo-da02.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.200]) by imr-da06.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p5LJEjvD023586 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:14:45 -0400 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-da02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.def.1579b23d (55717) for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:14:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from magic-d23.mail.aol.com (magic-d23.mail.aol.com [172.19.146.157]) by cia-md01.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD018-d9a54e00eda110e; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:14:41 -0400 From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1f6d.75c3c831.3b3247a1@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:14:41 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC2 Desser tires again X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1f6d.75c3c831.3b3247a1_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 5004 X-AOL-IP: 24.15.17.119 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: Sky2high@aol.com --part1_1f6d.75c3c831.3b3247a1_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Luke, Thanks for the info. As I said I have two of the 100 mph tires on the shelf to eventually replace the old ones not so marked. I hope others will report on these new tires. I have not had any problems with the older style and they do last longer. The new tubes have a larger diameter as reported by Lorn. I recently had the pin-hole problem with an old tube and the newer replacement went in without having to use the pinch protecting inner sleeve. It would be great to get more info before taking this up with Desser directly. Scott Krueger In a message dated 6/21/2011 1:59:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time, lalcorn@natca.net writes: My tires were the new 100mph. I think it was Vietnam marked on them. They may have lasted with the cracks, but I did not want to take the risk. Also, since they are twice as much as the cheng-shin's, it is not worth it to me. They are easier to get on and off the rim, but I also did not have them on very long. Luke Alcorn --part1_1f6d.75c3c831.3b3247a1_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Luke,

Thanks for the info. As I said I have two of the 100 mph tires= on the=20 shelf to eventually replace the old ones not so marked. I hope= others=20 will report on these new tires.

I have not had any problems with the older style and they do last=20 longer. The new tubes have a larger diameter as reported by Lorn.&nb= sp;=20 I recently had the pin-hole problem with an old tube and the newer= =20 replacement went in without having to use the pinch protecting inner= =20 sleeve.

It would be great to get more info before taking this up with Desser= =20 directly.

Scott Krueger

In a message dated 6/21/2011 1:59:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 lalcorn@natca.net writes:

My tires were the new 100mph. I think it was Vietnam marked on= =20 them. They may have lasted with the cracks, but I did not want to= take=20 the risk. Also, since they are twice as much as the cheng-shin's,= it is=20 not worth it to me. They are easier to get on and off the rim, but= I=20 also did not have them on very long.

Luke Alcorn

--part1_1f6d.75c3c831.3b3247a1_boundary--