X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:55:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with SMTP id 5026598 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:08:08 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.138.90.73; envelope-from=wfhannahan@yahoo.com Received: from [98.138.90.51] by nm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jun 2011 22:07:34 -0000 Received: from [98.138.88.232] by tm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jun 2011 22:07:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1032.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jun 2011 22:07:21 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 168063.18293.bm@omp1032.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 13328 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jun 2011 22:07:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VXpaaJbJNtDVcGlLkou4UhOBEvseNezSNlk64wea5CtJvNN+VubuCwij1+tvIXVvd5RWRsH2fA0aLeSm01FUY+HZRZMU/u3Q1bs4ePH26yg17JmxltZ9QTD69gYal0Da4nlfNBduzVta9jw/znWaH7INdbu/gXpczcmhNJn3Ouk=; X-Original-Message-ID: <475053.13117.qm@web33906.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: hOTlhukVM1koFhzxUgcqIQtGq3QhnI5qs1640MHpEQIyUO8 vqKTOClOGf.yykmq5FiE1dByCtkAmn7g2CmBiNpkjyn85ZJmLhCdzykAd58O zv9iHlzcAyeeTjmFDBHcByk8CBWWly_A1XxyUqQopUdXDm.5PoDT6pwydtDf Z6JYczwnx3nii_0iIQJDDHDTMXNOQ0tCcBkCzBngmp3bgWyEXncij952nVX5 xd4_B4CsclzanQfwLlgjoYsq5_gzZ5ngz_GOqdkTe_b6sM_t9I1Vp9XBjhV_ F9MgNL6TK0gors56QRSrLL3eSTiQIXelNEooveKk7Q_qOQfVj0MoJ8u_CZZs Vd4Y70iU3kacX.WW2im9tfovc3XfiJNFizXjvHObCHPeWyda1FK7rEQ-- Received: from [174.29.162.41] by web33906.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:07:20 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.304355 X-Original-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:07:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Hannahan Subject: LNC2 Desser tires again X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-539766703-1308607640=:13117" --0-539766703-1308607640=:13117 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A=0A=0A=0ALuke,=0A=0A=A0=0A=0AI bought two areo=0Aclassic tires at Oshkos= h last summer. A few months ago I replaced=0Athe mains with one areo classi= c tire and one Cheng-Shin to compare performance.=0AThe cracks showed up al= most immediately in the aero classic. =0A=0A=A0=0A=0ANo chunking=0Aor balan= ce problems yet. No noticeable difference in rolling resistance. Too early= =0Ato tell about wear rate.=0A=0A=A0=0A=0A=0A=0AMy impression is that the r= ubber compound is too hard or=0Asimply of a poor quality for this applicati= on.=0A=0A=A0=0A=0A=0A=0A Regards, Bill Hannahan =20 wfhannahan@yahoo.com --- On Sat, 6/18/11, lalcorn@natca.net wrote: From: lalcorn@natca.net Subject: [LML] LNC2 Desser tires again To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Saturday, June 18, 2011, 6:32 PM Just an update on my situation with the areo classic tires.=A0 Desser sent = me another set to try and after 5 landings and light weight, they were comi= ng apart.=A0 Attached are the pictures.=A0 I also had alot of vibration wit= h these tires around 60 knots.=A0 I have gone back to the Cheng-shin and th= ey do not vibrate and are not coming apart.=0A=A0=0AI want to know if anyon= e else is having these problems with the aero classics?=A0 Desser has been = helpful with replacements, but i can not keep changing tires every month.= =0A=A0=0AAs a side note, spruce is sending the smaller Kenda tubes when ord= ering the cheng shin.=A0 The smaller tubes are much easier to put it.=A0 Th= ey almost seem too small in the cheng shins, but it is holding pressure and= seems to be working fine.=0A=A0=0A=0ALuke Alcorn =0A -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --0-539766703-1308607640=:13117 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=0A= =0A=0A

Luke,

=0A=0A

 

=0A=0A

I bought two areo=0Aclassic tires at = Oshkosh last summer. A few months ago I replaced=0Athe mains with o= ne areo classic tire and one Cheng-Shin to compare performance.=0AThe crack= s showed up almost immediately in the aero classic.

= =0A=0A

 

=0A=0A

No chunking=0Aor balance problems= yet. No noticeable difference in rolling resistance. Too early=0Ato tell a= bout wear rate.

=0A=0A

 

=0A= =0A

My impression is that the rubber compound is too = hard or=0Asimply of a poor quality for this application.

=0A=0A

 

=0A=0A

=0A=0A
Regards,
Bill Hannahan
=

--- On Sat, 6/18/11, lalc= orn@natca.net <lalcorn@natca.net> wrote:

From: lalcorn@natca.net <lalcorn@natca.net>
Subject= : [LML] LNC2 Desser tires again
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Satur= day, June 18, 2011, 6:32 PM

Just an update on my situation with the areo classic ti= res.  Desser sent me another set to try and after 5 landings and light= weight, they were coming apart.  Attached are the pictures.  I a= lso had alot of vibration with these tires around 60 knots.  I have go= ne back to the Cheng-shin and they do not vibrate and are not coming apart.=

=0A

 

=0A

I want to know if anyone else is having these pro= blems with the aero classics?  Desser has been helpful with replacemen= ts, but i can not keep changing tires every month.

=0A

 

=0AAs a side note, spruce is sending the smaller Kenda tubes when ordering th= e cheng shin.  The smaller tubes are much easier to put it.  They= almost seem too small in the cheng shins, but it is holding pressure and s= eems to be working fine.

=0A

 

=0A=0A

Luke Alcorn

=0A


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironli= ne.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
--0-539766703-1308607640=:13117--