X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:32:00 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from TX2EHSOBE002.bigfish.com ([65.55.88.11] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTPS id 5024639 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 14:09:42 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.88.11; envelope-from=rpastusek@htii.com Received: from mail131-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.243) by TX2EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.9.40.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:09:06 +0000 Received: from mail131-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail131-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55DBA601AF for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:09:06 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: 1 X-BigFish: VPS1(z1a2crz1804K98dKzz1202hzz2bf6K8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h8aah62h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 1:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:65.55.171.153;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPVD:NLI;SRV:BULK;H:va3diahub020.RED001.local;RD:smtp801.microsoftonline.com;EFVD:NLI Received-SPF: pass (mail131-tx2: domain of htii.com designates 65.55.171.153 as permitted sender) client-ip=65.55.171.153; envelope-from=rpastusek@htii.com; helo=va3diahub020.RED001.local ;RED001.local ; Received: from mail131-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail131-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1308420545729460_3285; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS017.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.254]) by mail131-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1CAF5004B for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from va3diahub020.RED001.local (65.55.171.153) by TX2EHSMHS017.bigfish.com (10.9.99.117) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.22; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:08:59 +0000 Received: from VA3DIAXVS171.RED001.local ([172.18.2.196]) by va3diahub020.RED001.local ([10.32.21.20]) with mapi; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:11:40 -0700 From: Robert R Pastusek X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:07:36 -0700 Subject: RE: [LML] And how about a full feathering prop? Thread-Topic: [LML] And how about a full feathering prop? Thread-Index: AcwtumE1p4bdqPU1RleaUwHJIkiL2wAJTLlQ X-Original-Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E374BE0180357344BBD396A27A0527F60FF8C46295VA3DIAXVS171R_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Return-Path: rpastusek@htii.com X-OriginatorOrg: htii.com