Return-Path: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from [144.54.3.2] (HELO picker.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.3)
  with ESMTP id 734454 for lancair.list@logan.com; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 01:14:10 -0400
Received: from <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro RULES 3.3b1)
  with RULES id 3625727; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 01:14:08 -0400
X-Autogenerated: Mirror
X-Mirrored-by: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from [144.54.37.11] (HELO ct.picker.com)
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1)
  with ESMTP id 3625726 for rob@med.marconi.com; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 01:14:06 -0400
Received: from picker.com (central.picker.com [144.54.3.2])
	by ct.picker.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA07920
	for <rob>; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 01:14:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified)
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1)
  with ESMTP id 3625725 for rob@ct.picker.com; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 01:14:05 -0400
Received: from smtp3.gateway.net ([208.230.117.247]) by pop3.olsusa.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35)
          with ESMTP id com for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>;
          Fri, 6 Apr 2001 01:08:07 -0400
Received: from f3g6s4 (1Cust89.tnt3.coeur-dalene.id.da.uu.net [63.15.161.89])
	by smtp3.gateway.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA18545
	for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 01:13:51 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <001401c0be58$a8101680$59a10f3f@f3g6s4>
Reply-To: "dfs" <dfs@gateway.net>
Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com
From: "dfs" <dfs@gateway.net>
To: "Lancair list" <lancair.list@olsusa.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: Fuel Valve
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:15:53 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
In response to Dave's query about a Lancair IV that had a "both" fuel system
and subsequent crash.

Dave, haven't heard about that one but, if memory serves, I can't think of a
single "certificated"  low wing spam can that has a "both" fuel system. Must
be a reason. Think I remember reading somewhere that the tanks just won't
feed equally, then when one tank goes empty, the fuel pump will suck air
from that tank. Not the kind of excitement one would choose if one had the
choice. Which is the point, since we, as builders, do have the choice.

I'm probably wrong, but the only ones that come to mind that do have a
"both" fuel feed system are high wing aircraft - like Cessnas, etc. since
the fuel will gravity flow into the common fuel line and displace any air
from the other tank.

Dan Schaefer

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
LML Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>