Return-Path: Received: from marvkaye.olsusa.com ([205.245.9.241]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with SMTP id AAA6660 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 12:00:13 -0400 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19981008115948.00ce632c@olsusa.com> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 11:59:48 -0400 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: ReganRanch@aol.com (by way of Marvin Kaye ) Subject: Fuel Tank Plumbing X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> In a message dated 98-10-08 01:12:45 EDT, you write: << The wings are mounted at an angle to the horizontal plane. Gravity would take any fuel and attempt to empty the tanks if given an opportunity. If both tanks emptied into a tiny 1 pint reservoir and that reservoir was considered the "tank" in the first paragraph, wouldn't that get rid of the manual switching of tanks, and reduce the amount of plumbing, connections and weight? >> What you are describing is essentially a "BOTH" position on a fuel valve. It is OK to have both tanks connected on a high-wing but a bad, and sometimes fatal, idea on a low wing. On a spam can high wing the fuel tanks occupy a short percentage of the wingspan and they are significantly higher than the fuel pump. These two factors combine to make it very difficult for the right fuel system to be completely above the left or visa versa. If one tank runs dry, gravity supplies fuel from the other tank to ensure a prime on the fuel pump even with low fuel levels. On a low wing the fuel is below the engine and the fuel pump, particularly at the end of a long Xcountry. It is relatively easy to get in the situation where you un-port (fuel sloshing away from the fuel strainer) one tank while the other tank line head pressure is below ambient. The immediate result is instant "Quiet flight" and of course this is most likely to happen low and slow in the pattern. One way out is to consider the last 10 gallons or so to be "Unusable" but then you are trading 5 pounds of lines and valves for 60 pounds of fuel. Another complication is evenly dividing the flow from the fuel return line back to the two tanks. The short answer is "BOTH" works fine on a low wing UNTIL you need the last few gallons, then it is a crapshoot. Brent