Return-Path: Received: from imo-d01.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.33]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 12:35:34 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.32.) id k.3e.2c3ff56 (3703) for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 12:42:54 -0500 (EST) From: RWolf99@aol.com Message-ID: <3e.2c3ff56.272dbb9d@aol.com> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 12:42:53 EST Subject: Re: MoGas To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> In a message dated 10/28/0 11:52:45 PM, Dan Schafer wrote: <> Almost certainly true. I used to fill my 150 with the cheapest gas I could find. I loaned the airplane to a friend for a few weeks and he couldn't bear putting the cheap gas in an airplane, so he used Chevron and claimed the engine ran smoother. I switched to Chevron and, if only in my imagination, the engine does run a little smoother. It's probably only my imagination, but 100% or our sample pilots (two) think it's better. The EAA has done extensive testing on autogas and I trust their results, so I'm comfortable running an airplane on it. However, it is true that there are no guarantees with autogas that you're getting the same stuff every time. I think a name-brand station with a high turnover of product should give you better gas than the no-name station that has fuel stored in their tanks for months. By the way, if the refueling truck is there refilling the gas station tanks, come back in a few hours to let the tanks settle or go somewhere else. - Rob Wolf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>