|
|
Attached is a very unscientific spreadsheet that I used when considering whether to buy a IV-P, ES-P, TBM, etc. You can change many of the parameters/assumptions in the spreadsheet. I opted for the iv-p despite the higher insurance costs because of its speed, efficiency and range and do not regret my decision after flying the iv-p for 2 1/2 years and nearly 400 hours. At todays prices, the iv-p is a steal, and for the money nothing can touch its performance. It is safe with proper training (I highly recommend LOBO) and a blast to fly. If you have any questions regarding the spreadsheet or iv-p ownership, give me a call. 620 338 1619.
Shane
89GG
-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Craig Jimenez
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 6:53 AM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: LNC4 - Looking for a great IV-P less than $250k
What are real-world speeds and ranges for ES-Ps at say 14,000' and 24,000'? The lower alt may be useful for shorter trips, ATC restrictions, or strong westerlies.
Also, are there many with ThermX or TKS, and if so, what's been the experience? I'd expect a smaller percentage hit in speed from anti-ice on the ES-P than on the sleek IVP, but may be wrong.
Have enough been built for there to be a good body of knowledge on maintenance and operations?
I like the short takeoff numbers (at least as published) & good cabin pressure differential.
Craig
> You should consider an ES-P:
>
> - $5k/year for $1m hull/liability insurance
>
> - Only HPAT required - no minimum hours
>
> - No recorded gear up landings to date
>
> - Only one recorded fatal, and it appears to be medically related
>
> - Slightly slower, but,
--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
|
|