X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 05:42:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-yh0-f54.google.com ([209.85.213.54] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with ESMTPS id 7000375 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 10:35:12 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.213.54; envelope-from=mwsletten@gmail.com Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id v1so3764296yhn.13 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:34:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.149.134 with SMTP id x6mr28314021yhj.149.1406385277284; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:34:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.74.137 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:34:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Mark Sletten X-Original-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 09:34:17 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: FW: [LML] Re: Gascolators and fuel lines. X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303a2fb9deb7dd04ff1996e9 --20cf303a2fb9deb7dd04ff1996e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable BTW, we might consider taking this discussion over to LancairTalk.net. I've already posted the bulk of my argument here: http://lancairtalk.net/viewtopic.php?f=3D6&t=3D219#p483 --Mark On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:39 PM, John B <2thman1@gmail.com> wrote: > Like most of you who responded I would not give up the gascolator. Have > done two annuals since flying and both times have found almost a teaspoon > of white fuzzy stuff. Fiberglass particles I'm virtually certain, and I > thought I had done a perfect job of cleaning out the tanks before first > flight. > > John > > Sent from my iPad > > > On Jul 24, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Robert R Pastusek > wrote: > > Adam, > > > My experience is the same as yours. I often found/drained water out of my > old Cherokee tanks, and MANY rental airplanes as well. All were parked > outside, and I think avgas came with a certain amount of =E2=80=9Cwater a= dded=E2=80=9D in > the old days=E2=80=A6 L > > > > I=E2=80=99ve never found any water in the gascolator of my IV-P, so the f= uel > doesn=E2=80=99t have/collect any water=E2=80=A6or it=E2=80=99s going thro= ugh the engine and being > vaporized--which I think unlikely. I know the gas caps are MUCH better th= an > the old Cherokee =E2=80=9Cstoppers,=E2=80=9D and I rarely park the Lancai= r outside these > days. > > > > Like you, I was meticulous in cleaning/keeping the fuel tanks/lines clean > during fabrication and through flight test. I still collected some small > amounts of carbon fuzz, and a few bits of aluminum in the gascolator duri= ng > testing, and at the first two condition inspections. Almost undetectable > bits of something for the last three, not enough to even identify when > poured onto a piece of white paper=E2=80=A6 So the gascolator/filter is p= robably > not serving a useful function today=E2=80=A6but deleting it would be like= throwing > away the spare tire in my car, IMHO=E2=80=A6 I carry a few critical spare= parts in > my airplane for the same reason=E2=80=A6 > > > > Bob > > > > *From:* Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net > ] *On Behalf Of *Adam Molny > *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 1:30 PM > *To:* Lancair Mailing List > *Subject:* [LML] Re: Gascolators and fuel lines. > > > > Hi Mark =E2=80=93 > > > > Our planes are kept in a heated hangar so there=E2=80=99s no opportunity = for water > in the system from rain or condensation. Back when I was renting Cessnas > and Pipers I did occasionally drain water from the gascolator. Those plan= es > were kept outside. > > > > The lowest point in the Legacy fuel system is the fuel selector valve, bu= t > it=E2=80=99s not designed to capture water or sediment like a gascolator.= Your > notion that the fuel flows too fast for water to settle out is difficult = to > prove or disprove. I always envisioned tiny globs of water flowing out of > the fuel tanks and coalescing into a large glob of water in the gascolato= r. > The real test would be to pour a cup of water into one wing tank, run the > engine at high power, and see where the water ends up (in the gascolator, > out the tailpipe, or back to the fuel tank). However, deliberately adding > water to the fuel system seems like a bad idea so I=E2=80=99m not going t= o try it. > > > > I think you are saying you want fuel filtration but there=E2=80=99s no po= int in > having water separation since a gascolator won=E2=80=99t work. Can you be= 100% > certain that you will never get water in your system? What about flying > through rain with a loose fuel cap? What about being parked outside at > Oshkosh for a week? If you do get water in the system, where will it go? = I > hate to fall back on the =E2=80=9CIt=E2=80=99s always been done that way= =E2=80=9D argument, but > gascolators exist for a reason. > > > > For all the Legacy drivers out there: Have any of you ever discovered > water in the gascolator? > > > > Good discussion! > > -Adam Molny > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Mark Sletten [mailto:mwsletten@gmail.com ] > *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 9:15 AM > *To:* Adam Molny > *Subject:* Re: Gascolators and fuel lines. > > > > Adam, > > > > I wasn't questioning the value of fuel filtration, just whether a > gascolator is the best choice. As I understand it, the gascolator provide= s > a means to filter the fuel and a low point to catch water that may have > gotten into the fuel system. There are several arguments against using on= e > for the Legacy. > > 1. In the Legacy the gascolator is not the lowest point in the fuel > delivery path from the tank to the engine, so water in the tank should= not > flow to the gascolator before turning on the pumps. (I believe the sam= e is > true of the RV. Has your wife ever drained any water from her gascolat= or?) > 2. Given the high fuel flow rate and recirculation of unused fuel to > the tank, it's unlikely the gascolator will remove any water with the > engine running. > 3. The gascolator in the engine compartment provides a large surface > area to add heat to the fuel which can contribute to vapor lock. Lanca= ir > combats this with a heat shroud and blast air, adding weight and compl= exity. > 4. The gascolator requires numerous fittings and breaks in the fuel > lines, adding to complexity, weight and the possibility of fuel leaks. > > Since the gascolator appears to be rather useless at removing water, > it's primary function for the Legacy is filtration. With so many other > filtration options available, it seems illogical to put a gascolator in t= he > engine compartment. > > > > What do you think? > > > > --Mark > > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Adam Molny > wrote: > > Mark =E2=80=93 > > > > The gascolator provides a large reservoir for capturing water and > sediment. It also contains a fine screen with a fairly large area that ac= ts > the final filtration element to keep junk out of your carburetor or > injector(s). > > > > Case in point: my wife=E2=80=99s RV6-A started showing small amounts of d= ebris > when sumping the fuel tank drains and gascolator. We opened up the > gascolator and found a small amount of debris at the bottom of the bowl, > and the screen was about 5% blocked. There was no immediate danger, since > the bowl would have to completely fill with debris and the screen would > have to be 100% blocked in order to kill the engine. It turned out to be > bits of fuel tank sealant flaking off. > > > > My point here is that the gascolator acts as a buffer and gives you lots > of warning and lots of time to head off any potential fuel contamination > problem. > > > > What is the argument for omitting the gascolator on fuel injected engines= ? > > > > -Adam Molny > > Legacy N181AM 255hrs > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Mark Sletten [mailto:mwsletten@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 23, 2014 7:35 AM > *Subject:* Gascolators and fuel lines. > > > > Gang, > > > > First: Gascolators. There is a great deal of debate around the web on the > benefits of a gascolator in fuel injected systems. What's the consensus > among Lancairians? > > > > Second: I'm considering making my own engine compartment fuel lines. I > plan to build them up from scratch including the fire sleeve (or not if t= he > hose is sufficiently fire resistant). Anyone have a recommendation on the > type of hose to use? > > > > --Mark > > > > --20cf303a2fb9deb7dd04ff1996e9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
BTW, we might consider taking this discussion over to Lanc= airTalk.net. I've already posted the bulk of my argument here:

=

--Mark


<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">

On Thu, Jul 24= , 2014 at 4:39 PM, John B <2thman1@gmail.com> wrote:
Like most of you who = responded I would not give up the gascolator. =C2=A0Have done two annuals s= ince flying and both times have found almost a teaspoon of white fuzzy stuf= f. Fiberglass particles I'm virtually certain, =C2=A0and I thought I ha= d done a perfect job of cleaning out the tanks before first flight.

John=C2=A0

Sent from my iPad


On Jul 24, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek@htii.com> wrote= :

Adam,


My experience is the same as yours. I often found/drained water out of my o= ld Cherokee tanks, and MANY rental airplanes as well. All were parked outsi= de, and I think avgas came with a certain amount of =E2=80=9Cwater added=E2= =80=9D in the old days=E2=80=A6 L

=C2=A0

I=E2=80=99ve never found = any water in the gascolator of my IV-P, so the fuel doesn=E2=80=99t have/co= llect any water=E2=80=A6or it=E2=80=99s going through the engine and being vaporized--which I think unlikely. I know the gas cap= s are MUCH better than the old Cherokee =E2=80=9Cstoppers,=E2=80=9D and I r= arely park the Lancair outside these days.

=C2=A0

Like you, I was meticulou= s in cleaning/keeping the fuel tanks/lines clean during fabrication and thr= ough flight test. I still collected some small amounts of carbon fuzz, and a few bits of alu= minum in the gascolator during testing, and at the first two condition insp= ections. Almost undetectable bits of something for the last three, not enou= gh to even identify when poured onto a piece of white paper=E2=80=A6 So the gascolator/filter is probably = not serving a useful function today=E2=80=A6but deleting it would be like t= hrowing away the spare tire in my car, IMHO=E2=80=A6 I carry a few critical= spare parts in my airplane for the same reason=E2=80=A6

=C2=A0

Bob<= /p>

=C2=A0

From: Lancair Mailing List [m= ailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Adam Molny
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 1:30 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Gascolators and fuel lines.<= /p>

=C2=A0

Hi Mark =E2=80=93

=C2=A0

Our planes are kept in a heate= d hangar so there=E2=80=99s no opportunity for water in the system from rai= n or condensation. Back when I was renting Cessnas and Pipers I did occasionally drain water from the gascolator. Those planes were kept o= utside.

=C2=A0

The lowest point in the Legacy= fuel system is the fuel selector valve, but it=E2=80=99s not designed to c= apture water or sediment like a gascolator. Your notion that the fuel flows too fast for water to settle out is difficult to prove or dispr= ove. I always envisioned tiny globs of water flowing out of the fuel tanks = and coalescing into a large glob of water in the gascolator. The real test = would be to pour a cup of water into one wing tank, run the engine at high power, and see where the water = ends up (in the gascolator, out the tailpipe, or back to the fuel tank). Ho= wever, deliberately adding water to the fuel system seems like a bad idea s= o I=E2=80=99m not going to try it.

=C2=A0

I think you are saying you wan= t fuel filtration but there=E2=80=99s no point in having water separation s= ince a gascolator won=E2=80=99t work. Can you be 100% certain that you will never get water in your system? What about flying through rain with a loos= e fuel cap? What about being parked outside at Oshkosh for a week? If you d= o get water in the system, where will it go? I hate to fall back on the =E2= =80=9CIt=E2=80=99s always been done that way=E2=80=9D argument, but gascolators exist for a reason.

=C2=A0

For all the Legacy drivers out= there: Have any of you ever discovered water in the gascolator?<= /u>

=C2=A0

Good discussion!

-Adam Molny

From: Mark Sle= tten [mailto:mwsle= tten@gmail.com]

Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 9:15 AM
To: Adam Molny
Subject: Re: Gascolators and fuel lines.
=

=C2=A0

Adam,

=C2=A0

I wasn't questioning the value of fuel filtratio= n, just whether a gascolator is the best choice. As I understand it, the ga= scolator provides a means to filter the fuel and a low point to catch water= that may have gotten into the fuel system. There are several arguments against using one for the Legacy.

  1. In the Legacy the gascolator is not the lowest point in the fuel deli= very path from the tank to the engine, so water in the tank should not flow= to the gascolator before turning on the pumps. (I believe the same is true of the RV. Has your wife ever drained any water from her = gascolator?)
  2. Given the high fuel flow rate and recirculation of unused fuel to the= tank, it's unlikely the gascolator will remove any water with the engi= ne running.
  3. The gascolator in the engine compartment provides a large surface are= a to add heat to the fuel which can contribute to vapor lock. Lancair comba= ts this with a heat shroud and blast air, adding weight and complexity.
  4. The gascolator requires numerous fittings and breaks in the fuel line= s, adding to complexity, weight and the possibility of fuel leaks.

Since the gascolator appears to be rather useless at= removing water, it's primary function for the Legacy is filtration. Wi= th so many other filtration options available, it seems illogical to put a = gascolator in the engine compartment.

=C2=A0

What do you think?

=C2=A0

--Mark

=C2=A0<= /p>

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Adam Molny <Adam@validatio= npartners.com> wrote:

Mark =E2=80=93

=C2=A0

The gascolator provides a larg= e reservoir for capturing water and sediment. It also contains a fine scree= n with a fairly large area that acts the final filtration element to keep ju= nk out of your carburetor or injector(s).

=C2=A0

Case in point: my wife=E2=80= =99s RV6-A started showing small amounts of debris when sumping the fuel ta= nk drains and gascolator. We opened up the gascolator and found a small amount of de= bris at the bottom of the bowl, and the screen was about 5% blocked. There = was no immediate danger, since the bowl would have to completely fill with = debris and the screen would have to be 100% blocked in order to kill the engine. It turned out to be bits o= f fuel tank sealant flaking off.

=C2=A0

My point here is that the gasc= olator acts as a buffer and gives you lots of warning and lots of time to head off any potential fuel contamination problem.

=C2=A0

What is the argument for omitt= ing the gascolator on fuel injected engines?

=C2=A0

-Adam Molny

Legacy N181AM 255hrs=

From: Mark Sletten [mailto:mwsletten@gmail.com]

Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 7:35 AM
Subject: Gascolators and fuel lines.

=C2=A0

Gang,

=C2=A0

First: Gascolators. There is a great deal of debate = around the web on the benefits of a gascolator in fuel injected systems. Wh= at's the consensus among Lancairians?=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Second: I'm considering making my own engine com= partment fuel lines. I plan to build them up from scratch including the fir= e sleeve (or not if the hose is sufficiently fire resistant). Anyone have a recommendation on the type of hose to use?

=C2=A0

--Mark

=C2=A0


--20cf303a2fb9deb7dd04ff1996e9--