X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:39:39 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with ESMTPS id 6997832 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:15:46 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.192.170; envelope-from=2thman1@gmail.com Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id g10so4401138pdj.1 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:15:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.70.123.103 with SMTP id lz7mr7515036pdb.61.1406236509786; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:15:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from [192.168.0.33] (97-113-50-85.tukw.qwest.net. [97.113.50.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y1sm6570875pbw.87.2014.07.24.14.15.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1D1FDB15-3D06-49FC-8B57-67BE3DEEF10B Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [LML] FW: [LML] Re: Gascolators and fuel lines. From: John B <2thman1@gmail.com> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D257) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:15:07 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-Message-Id: References: X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-1D1FDB15-3D06-49FC-8B57-67BE3DEEF10B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Like most of you who responded I would not give up the gascolator. Have don= e two annuals since flying and both times have found almost a teaspoon of wh= ite fuzzy stuff. Fiberglass particles I'm virtually certain, and I thought I= had done a perfect job of cleaning out the tanks before first flight. John=20 Sent from my iPad > On Jul 24, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Robert R Pastusek wrote= : >=20 > Adam, >=20 > My experience is the same as yours. I often found/drained water out of my o= ld Cherokee tanks, and MANY rental airplanes as well. All were parked outsid= e, and I think avgas came with a certain amount of =E2=80=9Cwater added=E2=80= =9D in the old days=E2=80=A6 L > =20 > I=E2=80=99ve never found any water in the gascolator of my IV-P, so the fu= el doesn=E2=80=99t have/collect any water=E2=80=A6or it=E2=80=99s going thro= ugh the engine and being vaporized--which I think unlikely. I know the gas c= aps are MUCH better than the old Cherokee =E2=80=9Cstoppers,=E2=80=9D and I r= arely park the Lancair outside these days. > =20 > Like you, I was meticulous in cleaning/keeping the fuel tanks/lines clean d= uring fabrication and through flight test. I still collected some small amou= nts of carbon fuzz, and a few bits of aluminum in the gascolator during test= ing, and at the first two condition inspections. Almost undetectable bits of= something for the last three, not enough to even identify when poured onto a= piece of white paper=E2=80=A6 So the gascolator/filter is probably not serv= ing a useful function today=E2=80=A6but deleting it would be like throwing a= way the spare tire in my car, IMHO=E2=80=A6 I carry a few critical spare par= ts in my airplane for the same reason=E2=80=A6 > =20 > Bob > =20 > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ada= m Molny > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 1:30 PM > To: Lancair Mailing List > Subject: [LML] Re: Gascolators and fuel lines. > =20 > Hi Mark =E2=80=93 > =20 > Our planes are kept in a heated hangar so there=E2=80=99s no opportunity f= or water in the system from rain or condensation. Back when I was renting Ce= ssnas and Pipers I did occasionally drain water from the gascolator. Those p= lanes were kept outside. > =20 > The lowest point in the Legacy fuel system is the fuel selector valve, but= it=E2=80=99s not designed to capture water or sediment like a gascolator. Y= our notion that the fuel flows too fast for water to settle out is difficult= to prove or disprove. I always envisioned tiny globs of water flowing out o= f the fuel tanks and coalescing into a large glob of water in the gascolator= . The real test would be to pour a cup of water into one wing tank, run the e= ngine at high power, and see where the water ends up (in the gascolator, out= the tailpipe, or back to the fuel tank). However, deliberately adding water= to the fuel system seems like a bad idea so I=E2=80=99m not going to try it= . > =20 > I think you are saying you want fuel filtration but there=E2=80=99s no poi= nt in having water separation since a gascolator won=E2=80=99t work. Can you= be 100% certain that you will never get water in your system? What about fl= ying through rain with a loose fuel cap? What about being parked outside at O= shkosh for a week? If you do get water in the system, where will it go? I ha= te to fall back on the =E2=80=9CIt=E2=80=99s always been done that way=E2=80= =9D argument, but gascolators exist for a reason. > =20 > For all the Legacy drivers out there: Have any of you ever discovered wate= r in the gascolator? > =20 > Good discussion! > -Adam Molny > From: Mark Sletten [mailto:mwsletten@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 9:15 AM > To: Adam Molny > Subject: Re: Gascolators and fuel lines. > =20 > Adam, > =20 > I wasn't questioning the value of fuel filtration, just whether a gascolat= or is the best choice. As I understand it, the gascolator provides a means t= o filter the fuel and a low point to catch water that may have gotten into t= he fuel system. There are several arguments against using one for the Legacy= . > In the Legacy the gascolator is not the lowest point in the fuel delivery p= ath from the tank to the engine, so water in the tank should not flow to the= gascolator before turning on the pumps. (I believe the same is true of the R= V. Has your wife ever drained any water from her gascolator?) > Given the high fuel flow rate and recirculation of unused fuel to the tank= , it's unlikely the gascolator will remove any water with the engine running= . > The gascolator in the engine compartment provides a large surface area to a= dd heat to the fuel which can contribute to vapor lock. Lancair combats this= with a heat shroud and blast air, adding weight and complexity. > The gascolator requires numerous fittings and breaks in the fuel lines, ad= ding to complexity, weight and the possibility of fuel leaks. > Since the gascolator appears to be rather useless at removing water, it's p= rimary function for the Legacy is filtration. With so many other filtration o= ptions available, it seems illogical to put a gascolator in the engine compa= rtment. > =20 > What do you think? > =20 > --Mark > =20 >=20 > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Adam Molny w= rote: > Mark =E2=80=93 > =20 > The gascolator provides a large reservoir for capturing water and sediment= . It also contains a fine screen with a fairly large area that acts the fina= l filtration element to keep junk out of your carburetor or injector(s). > =20 > Case in point: my wife=E2=80=99s RV6-A started showing small amounts of de= bris when sumping the fuel tank drains and gascolator. We opened up the gasc= olator and found a small amount of debris at the bottom of the bowl, and the= screen was about 5% blocked. There was no immediate danger, since the bowl w= ould have to completely fill with debris and the screen would have to be 10= 0% blocked in order to kill the engine. It turned out to be bits of fuel tan= k sealant flaking off. > =20 > My point here is that the gascolator acts as a buffer and gives you lots o= f warning and lots of time to head off any potential fuel contamination prob= lem. > =20 > What is the argument for omitting the gascolator on fuel injected engines?= > =20 > -Adam Molny > Legacy N181AM 255hrs > From: Mark Sletten [mailto:mwsletten@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 7:35 AM > Subject: Gascolators and fuel lines. > =20 > Gang, > =20 > First: Gascolators. There is a great deal of debate around the web on the b= enefits of a gascolator in fuel injected systems. What's the consensus among= Lancairians?=20 > =20 > Second: I'm considering making my own engine compartment fuel lines. I pla= n to build them up from scratch including the fire sleeve (or not if the hos= e is sufficiently fire resistant). Anyone have a recommendation on the type o= f hose to use? > =20 > --Mark > =20 --Apple-Mail-1D1FDB15-3D06-49FC-8B57-67BE3DEEF10B Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Like most of you who responded I would= not give up the gascolator.  Have done two annuals since flying and bo= th times have found almost a teaspoon of white fuzzy stuff. Fiberglass parti= cles I'm virtually certain,  and I thought I had done a perfect job of c= leaning out the tanks before first flight.

John&nbs= p;

Sent from my iPad


On Jul 24, 2014, at= 11:15 AM, Robert R Pastusek <rpast= usek@htii.com> wrote:

=

Adam,


My experience is the same as yours. I often found/drained water out of my ol= d Cherokee tanks, and MANY rental airplanes as well. All were parked outside= , and I think avgas came with a certain amount of =E2=80=9Cwater added=E2=80= =9D in the old days=E2=80=A6
L

 

I=E2=80=99ve never found any water in the gascolator o= f my IV-P, so the fuel doesn=E2=80=99t have/collect any water=E2=80=A6or it=E2= =80=99s going through the engine and being vaporized--which I think unlikely. I know the gas caps= are MUCH better than the old Cherokee =E2=80=9Cstoppers,=E2=80=9D and I rar= ely park the Lancair outside these days.

 

Like you, I was meticulous in cleaning/keeping the fue= l tanks/lines clean during fabrication and through flight test. I still collected some small amounts of carbon fuzz, and a few bits of alum= inum in the gascolator during testing, and at the first two condition inspec= tions. Almost undetectable bits of something for the last three, not enough t= o even identify when poured onto a piece of white paper=E2=80=A6 So the gascolator/filter is probably n= ot serving a useful function today=E2=80=A6but deleting it would be like thr= owing away the spare tire in my car, IMHO=E2=80=A6 I carry a few critical sp= are parts in my airplane for the same reason=E2=80=A6

 

Bob

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancairon= line.net] On Behalf Of Adam Molny
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 1:30 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Gascolators and fuel lines.

 

Hi Mark =E2=80=93

 

Our planes are kept in a heated h= angar so there=E2=80=99s no opportunity for water in the system from rain or= condensation. Back when I was renting Cessnas and Pipers I did occasionally drain water from the gascolator. Those planes were kept ou= tside.

 

The lowest point in the Legacy f= uel system is the fuel selector valve, but it=E2=80=99s not designed to capt= ure water or sediment like a gascolator. Your notion that the fuel flows too fast for water to settle out is difficult to prove or dispro= ve. I always envisioned tiny globs of water flowing out of the fuel tanks an= d coalescing into a large glob of water in the gascolator. The real test wou= ld be to pour a cup of water into one wing tank, run the engine at high power, and see where the water e= nds up (in the gascolator, out the tailpipe, or back to the fuel tank). Howe= ver, deliberately adding water to the fuel system seems like a bad idea so I= =E2=80=99m not going to try it.

 

I think you are saying you want f= uel filtration but there=E2=80=99s no point in having water separation since= a gascolator won=E2=80=99t work. Can you be 100% certain that you will never get water in your system? What about flying through rain with a loose= fuel cap? What about being parked outside at Oshkosh for a week? If you do g= et water in the system, where will it go? I hate to fall back on the =E2=80=9C= It=E2=80=99s always been done that way=E2=80=9D argument, but gascolators exist for a reason.

 

For all the Legacy drivers out t= here: Have any of you ever discovered water in the gascolator?

 

Good discussion!

-Adam Molny


From: Mark Sletten [mail= to:mwsletten@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 9:15 AM
To: Adam Molny
Subject: Re: Gascolators and fuel lines.

 

Adam,

 

I wasn't questioning the value of fuel filtration, ju= st whether a gascolator is the best choice. As I understand it, the gascolat= or provides a means to filter the fuel and a low point to catch water that m= ay have gotten into the fuel system. There are several arguments against using one for the Legacy.

  1. In the L= egacy the gascolator is not the lowest point in the fuel delivery path from t= he tank to the engine, so water in the tank should not flow to the gascolato= r before turning on the pumps. (I believe the same is true of the RV. Has your wife ever drained any water from her g= ascolator?)
  2. Given th= e high fuel flow rate and recirculation of unused fuel to the tank, it's unl= ikely the gascolator will remove any water with the engine running.
  3. The gasc= olator in the engine compartment provides a large surface area to add heat t= o the fuel which can contribute to vapor lock. Lancair combats this with a h= eat shroud and blast air, adding weight and complexity.
  4. The gasc= olator requires numerous fittings and breaks in the fuel lines, adding to co= mplexity, weight and the possibility of fuel leaks.
  5. Since the gascolator appears to be rather useless at r= emoving water, it's primary function for the Legacy is filtration. With so m= any other filtration options available, it seems illogical to put a gascolat= or in the engine compartment.

 

What do you think?

 

--Mark

 

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Adam Molny <Adam@validationp= artners.com> wrote:

Mark =E2=80=93

 

The gascolator provides a large reservoir for c= apturing water and sediment. It also contains a fine screen with a fairly large area that acts the final filtration element to keep jun= k out of your carburetor or injector(s).

 

Case in point: my wife=E2=80=99s RV6-A started s= howing small amounts of debris when sumping the fuel tank drains and gascolator. We opened up the gascolator and found a small amount of deb= ris at the bottom of the bowl, and the screen was about 5% blocked. There wa= s no immediate danger, since the bowl would have to completely fill with deb= ris and the screen would have to be 100% blocked in order to kill the engine. It turned out to be bits of= fuel tank sealant flaking off.

 

My point here is that the gascolator acts as a b= uffer and gives you lots of warning and lots of time to head off any potential fuel contamination problem.

 

What is the argument for omitting the gascolato= r on fuel injected engines?

 

-Adam Molny

Legacy N181AM 255hrs


From: Mark Sletten [mailto:mwsletten@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 7:35 AM
Subject: Gascolators and fuel lines.

 

Gang,

 

First: Gascolators. There is a great deal of debate around the web o= n the benefits of a gascolator in fuel injected systems. What's the consensu= s among Lancairians? 

 

Second: I'm considering making my own engine compartment fuel lines.= I plan to build them up from scratch including the fire sleeve (or not if t= he hose is sufficiently fire resistant). Anyone have a recommendation on the type of hose to use?

 

--Mark

 

= --Apple-Mail-1D1FDB15-3D06-49FC-8B57-67BE3DEEF10B--