X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 07:11:12 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms173007pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with ESMTP id 6856818 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 May 2014 20:57:31 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.173.7; envelope-from=lancair403@verizon.net Received: from self87aab97f5d ([unknown] [71.176.4.251]) by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0N4Z00JKU3YLCS20@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 May 2014 19:56:46 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-Message-id: <4EBC269CDAAE4154B9D2B48388A004DD@self87aab97f5d> From: "William Rumburg" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: VMS1000 pressure gauges on LNC2 X-Original-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 20:56:40 -0400 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_018D_01CF6649.045886B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_018D_01CF6649.045886B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nick - By non-standard, I meant a transducer whose electrical parameters do not = match the VMS1000 and would, therefore, have to be adapted by additional = means such as a voltage divider. That would be going out on a limb and = risking unrepairable damage to the DPU. The US321 is a high-quality = transducer, whose electrical parameters match the VMS1000 exactly. Bill Rumburg N403WR (Sonic bOOm)=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Nick Long=20 To: Lancair Mailing List=20 Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:19 PM Subject: [LML] Re: VMS1000 pressure gauges on LNC2 Hi Bill, I think you answered the question. The US321 may be a lot better than = the original MediaMate, but it is not industry standard. Its advantage is that its a drop in replacement, which will be what = some people want. But I would prefer a solution using an industry = standard sensor. Yours, Nick ------=_NextPart_000_018D_01CF6649.045886B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Nick -
 
By non-standard, I meant a transducer = whose=20 electrical parameters do not match the VMS1000 and would,=20 therefore, have to be adapted by additional means such as a voltage = divider. That would be going out on a limb and = risking unrepairable=20 damage to the DPU. The US321 is = a=20 high-quality transducer, whose electrical parameters match the=20 VMS1000 exactly.
 
Bill Rumburg
N403WR (Sonic bOOm) 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Nick Long=20
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 = 12:19 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: VMS1000 = pressure=20 gauges on LNC2

Hi Bill,
 
I think you answered the question. The US321 may be a lot better = than the=20 original MediaMate, but it is not industry standard.
Its advantage is that its a drop in replacement, which will be = what some=20 people want. But I would prefer a solution using an industry standard=20 sensor.
 
Yours,
 
Nick
------=_NextPart_000_018D_01CF6649.045886B0--