Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 07:10:37 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-6858928@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.173.25; envelope-from=bbradburry@verizon.net
From: "Bill Bradburry" <bbradburry@verizon.net>
References: <list-6856221@logan.com>
In-reply-to: <list-6856221@logan.com>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Legacy White Paper
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: Ac9mKJfjtO3RTTU9S2eAFyNlaLVnIgANF5Tw

OK, so Kevin has quit the field with gallantry, however, Hamid would still
like to fight.  

Would anyone else care to take the field against Hamid until he tires??  :<)

Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Hamid
Wasti
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:04 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Legacy White Paper

On 5/2/2014 9:19 AM, Kevin Stallard wrote:
> I apologize for leaving that idea with you.  That isn't the intent.
You are not leaving that idea just with me.  It is the gist of your 
argument and is obvious to all who are reading it.

I am merely pointing out that when you go criticizing others for lacking 
rigorous proof while basing your argument on jumping to conclusions, it 
does not look good for you or your arguments.


On 5/2/2014 9:19 AM, Kevin Stallard wrote:
> We shouldn't release this as is.
As tens of thousands have found out the hard way, the internet does not 
have an undo button. The report has already been posted, which means it 
is "released"

Now if you can figure out a way to "unrelease" things already posted to 
the internet, you will make more than enough money to be flying your own 
Gulfstream (which does not have an open canopy issue) and not have to 
rub elbows with paupers who fly Lancairs :)

Regards,

Hamid


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html