Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.178.252.232; envelope-from=hwasti@lm50.com
Message-ID: <5363CFEB.4020407@lm50.com>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 10:03:39 -0700
From: Hamid Wasti <hwasti@lm50.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Legacy White Paper
References: <list-6856151@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-6856151@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 5/2/2014 9:19 AM, Kevin Stallard wrote:
> I apologize for leaving that idea with you.  That isn't the intent.
You are not leaving that idea just with me.  It is the gist of your 
argument and is obvious to all who are reading it.

I am merely pointing out that when you go criticizing others for lacking 
rigorous proof while basing your argument on jumping to conclusions, it 
does not look good for you or your arguments.


On 5/2/2014 9:19 AM, Kevin Stallard wrote:
> We shouldn't release this as is.
As tens of thousands have found out the hard way, the internet does not 
have an undo button. The report has already been posted, which means it 
is "released"

Now if you can figure out a way to "unrelease" things already posted to 
the internet, you will make more than enough money to be flying your own 
Gulfstream (which does not have an open canopy issue) and not have to 
rub elbows with paupers who fly Lancairs :)

Regards,

Hamid