X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from omr-d07.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.204] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.8) with ESMTPS id 6722460 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:47:33 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.109.204; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mbe01.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mbe01.mx.aol.com [172.26.254.175]) by omr-d07.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 09D1F7000008E for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:46:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from core-mlc005b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mlc005.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.188.211]) by mtaomg-mbe01.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id D0E8338000083 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:46:58 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com Full-name: Sky2high Message-ID: <6810d.5caaee9b.40264be2@aol.com> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:46:58 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [LML] Angle of attack To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_6810d.5caaee9b.40264be2_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 168 X-Originating-IP: [67.175.156.123] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1391784418; bh=/IU1AkHg4HjFKqWU1VLW1yMelOWm0fGidHnDl3CxMkE=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vaR0Ea/9ElAiMKlBW1xLlkrqOxDckoikE/TyklbRTyd1ev8ifhGvfuaZGMtjVJbPw lVQ3fJimktoW5nl6ydwq95hiMJZ3BXJ5ccMf3lZU0YOWG/d3EBIV3e8mk7GG/03aWC MXIf/dXDP0maal7vyKB0CWWtOyKL8pEq/Xld+YlE= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afeaf52f4f1e22512 --part1_6810d.5caaee9b.40264be2_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Tom, Interesting. The wing has wash out so different parts of the wing are at slightly different AOAs (think propagation of stall). The design has the longeron at zero degrees at cruise, flaps at reflex (think chord line from leading edge to flap TE). Even average angle of incidence doesn't work because of wing/flap design. Why not use zero, 1 or 2? Scott krueger In a message dated 2/7/2014 8:16:45 A.M. Central Standard Time, n20087@yahoo.com writes: > Folks I am about to setup a g3x in my 360. I was wondering if anybody could tell me what the typical cruise angle of attack might be Thanks Tom -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --part1_6810d.5caaee9b.40264be2_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Tom,

Interesting. The wing has wash out so different parts of the win= g are=20 at slightly different AOAs (think propagation of stall). The design h= as=20 the longeron at zero degrees at cruise, flaps at reflex (think chord line f= rom=20 leading edge to flap TE). Even average angle of incidence doesn't wor= k=20 because of wing/flap design. Why not use zero, 1 or 2?

Scott krueger

In a message dated 2/7/2014 8:16:45 A.M. Central Standard Time,=20 n20087@yahoo.com writes:

= >=20 Folks

I am about to setup a g3x in my 360. I was wondering = if=20 anybody could tell me what the typical cruise angle of attack might=20 be

Thanks

Tom
--
For archives and unsub=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html<= /DIV> --part1_6810d.5caaee9b.40264be2_boundary--