X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:28:08 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm35.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.229.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.8) with ESMTPS id 6695329 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:03:47 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.138.229.28; envelope-from=chris_zavatson@yahoo.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm35.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jan 2014 21:03:11 -0000 Received: from [98.138.101.128] by nm35.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jan 2014 21:00:21 -0000 Received: from [98.139.214.32] by tm16.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jan 2014 21:00:21 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.237] by tm15.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jan 2014 21:00:21 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1046.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jan 2014 21:00:21 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 584823.25191.bm@omp1046.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 41777 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jan 2014 21:00:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=K/hFgI9dnCiSgFXZHBFC0J/nQGLLatSem5rmJiP2ns50H+Uja2Mn2khtEB1IvAT6kA+w0eskwgqNxUB+LiZHHPHCgl8uZWp9WVU4IRTlhnC/+EIFUiuyc45ONsKMGbT/3eX8YwM8s4xOiGdNXUnVgZjW19CM8z7MmHe91UFJBr8=; X-YMail-OSG: bQjcvjMVM1lzNs_IpYoFpgnbFOwG52APVsvHy3Vr6AKtnRK re_MyfJOHJlHgmu6g6E9.IcIxram.gCoNMcpGs5n2jeFgG0s.2D2o6nQnpsn GzQYPnKbxuaSaofHwXSGzTpf85ObJwxZfPCbrcPrS4_FnWez2UoVEkLYNFfg Pu8kwnPNArsT7yZnojfFeJXpdhBiVDuqRtLGo8WE2hYDuHJXF2fm.vpL_xrt Mnc4EMqzzzx0TaB_ROfpmm9vsSVUSb6VDkXKf7p3rkuG9.We5n5.RVmx5sNI tLiGSEfIAupkcJBCPAzf9mt2958oHtcjO9j.5vPXzJgYOcRkh_PBczBHgT_W ut7O0IpP91aFfwkMkSnrYdq1_XWk5HvR1tkrUsIEmNpkmTBsYDAZ64Zojokw .O8kbYx.zW0o8s3EdpBt5r7CNR4cDyM39zh387.nlAP_uM2QaNQruz4PEfdq 3zkPHdJ.VWibwuE_Aab6cY2yY41MLBsSDQI2Z6rAn1mIRAcrGyCdKM35fU46 .iIwst7bg3.9loLNMVG_H1WusjvboOKUif8A0rLMSMqyegM98S.bQ8f336Lv 1FM647kiGC1o7lp5OeQ-- Received: from [172.14.16.72] by web161202.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:00:21 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,VGhpcyBicmluZ3MgdXAgYW5vdGhlciBxdWVzdGlvbi7CoCBIb3cgd2VsbCBkb2VzIHRoZSBwYXBlciBmaWx0ZXIgaG9sZCB1cCB3aGVuIGdldHRpbmcgc3RydWNrIGJ5IHJhaW4gZHJvcHMgYW5kIDI0MCBtcGg_wqAgSSB0aGluayBpbiBJVnMgYW5kIExlZ2FjeXMgdGhlIGZpbHRlciBpcyBzb21ld2hhdCBwcm90ZWN0ZWQgc28gdGhpcyBtYXkgbm90IGJlIGFuIGlzc3VlLsKgIEluIHRoZSAzMjAvMzYwIHRoZSBmaWx0ZXIgaXMgaW4gZGlyZWN0IHZpZXcgb2Ygb25jb21pbmcgYnVncyBhbmQgcmFpbiBkcm9wcy4BMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.173.622 X-Original-Message-ID: <1390251621.17440.YahooMailNeo@web161202.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:00:21 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Zavatson Reply-To: Chris Zavatson Subject: K&N air filter X-Original-To: LML posts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="356309654-433357604-1390251621=:17440" --356309654-433357604-1390251621=:17440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This brings up another question.=A0 How well does the paper filter hold up = when getting struck by rain drops and 240 mph?=A0 I think in IVs and Legacy= s the filter is somewhat protected so this may not be an issue.=A0 In the 3= 20/360 the filter is in direct view of oncoming bugs and rain drops.=0AChri= s=0A=0A=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=0ACan we agree that= a K&N filter is better than no filter at all?=A0 Of this, I am sure becaus= e each time I have cleaned or replaced my K&N, it has been noticeably dirty= .=0A=0AOpinions usually vary -=A0and mine does=A0as to=A0the use of K&N fil= ters in our often-IFR-used airplanes.=A0 I use the K&N filter despite the r= easons cited by previous writers on this topic.=A0 My use of=A0K&N filters = is because=A0they pass the "suck" test while paper filters fail this test= =A0(I have not exhaustively tested=A0 automotive=A0paper filters).=0A=0AIn = the=A0mid 1990's, I remember reading of a light aircraft that crashed becau= se it had ingested its own wet=A0air filter; yes it was a cellulose-type au= tomotive filter.=A0 (Sorry, I don't have references to this article or even= t.)=A0 Still building my LNC2 at that time, I=A0elected to do my own suck t= est -=A0and I recommend that you too do a suck test on your aircraft filter= s.=0A=0AConduct the=A0suck test=A0by cutting out a piece of old paper filte= r (automotive) and then wet part of it by dipping it in water.=A0 The other= half should be kept dry.=A0 Now, suck on the dry part and you will find th= at breathing is easy.=A0=A0Next, suck on the wet part and you will find you= rself turning blue for lack of oxygen.=0A=0ARepeat the suck test on a K&N f= ilter and you will note that breathing is easy whether wet or dry because t= he filter is oiled.=0A=0AI was satisfied that a wet paper filter could, ind= eed, cause power loss on an aircraft engine - especially because our IFR ai= rcraft must necessarily advance into clouds, rain, ice and snow without=A0t= he slightest power hesitation or interruption=A0- unlike racing automobiles= that=A0wisely avoid rain, ice and snow.=0A=0AMy shoulders are broad=A0and = my loins are girded;=A0I can take the slings and arrows that are sure to co= me.=A0 In the words of Bill O'Reilly, "Am I wrong?"=A0"=0A --356309654-433357604-1390251621=:17440 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This brings up a= nother question.  How well does the paper filter hold up when getting = struck by rain drops and 240 mph?  I think in IVs and Legacys the filt= er is somewhat protected so this may not be an issue.  In the 320/360 = the filter is in direct view of oncoming bugs and rain drops.
Chr= is

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D
Can we agree that a K&N filter is better than no filter a= t all?  Of this, I am sure because each time I have cleaned or replace= d my K&N, it has been noticeably dirty.

Opinio= ns usually vary - and mine does as to the use of K&N fil= ters in our often-IFR-used airplanes.  I use the K&N filter despit= e the reasons cited by previous writers on this topic.  My use of = ;K&N filters is because they pass the "suck" test while paper filters fail this test&= nbsp;(I have not exhaustively tested  automotive paper filters).<= /div>

In the mid 1990's, I remember reading of a li= ght aircraft that crashed because it had ingested its own wet air filt= er; yes it was a cellulose-type automotive filter.  (Sorry, I don't ha= ve references to this article or event.)  Still building my LNC2 at th= at time, I elected to do my own suck test - and I recommend that = you too do a suck test on your aircraft filters.

C= onduct the suck test by cutting out a piece of old paper filter (= automotive) and then wet part of it by dipping it in water.  The other= half should be kept dry.  Now, suck on the dry part and you will find= that breathing is easy.  Next, suck on the wet part and you will= find yourself turning blue for lack of oxygen.

Repeat the suck test on a K&N filter = and you will note that breathing is easy whether wet or dry because the fil= ter is oiled.

I was satisfied that a wet paper fil= ter could, indeed, cause power loss on an aircraft engine - especially beca= use our IFR aircraft must necessarily advance into clouds, rain, ice and sn= ow without the slightest power hesitation or interruption - unlik= e racing automobiles that wisely avoid rain, ice and snow.
<= br>
My shoulders are broad and my loins are girded; I c= an take the slings and arrows that are sure to come.  In the words of = Bill O'Reilly, "Am I wrong?" "
--356309654-433357604-1390251621=:17440--