X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:42:36 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [107.14.166.225] (HELO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTP id 6604616 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:45:19 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=107.14.166.225; envelope-from=kkellner1@new.rr.com X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [70.92.78.168] ([70.92.78.168:2320] helo=D4SSJS91) by cdptpa-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 39/79-29861-B4A8A825; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 21:44:44 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <4CFD2BD8918E4F60A5FA9D57D18937FE@D4SSJS91> From: "Ken" X-Original-To: , "Jay Phillips" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Sleep apnea X-Original-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:44:41 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Jay, Not to worry about the expense. I have it on good athourity that all of the testing will be covered under Obamacare. And, if you like your pilot certificate you can keep it, period. Ken Kellner ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jay Phillips" To: Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 10:00 AM Subject: RE: [LML] Sleep apnea >I don't disagree with you on anything you wrote, Doug. > > The article states that *all* pilots will be subject to this testing. BMI > has nothing to do with it other than being the "camel's nose under the > tent". So I will be forced to undergo this testing, at my expense, in > order > to continue exercising my pilot 'privileges'. > > Jay Phillips > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of R > Douglas Owen > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 6:45 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Sleep apnea > > I have a comment regarding the recent FAA rule regarding sleep apnea. > > I am a senior aviation medical examiner, a board certified family doc, and > a > IV-P turbine builder and pilot. > > During the evaluation of patients with sleep apnea, I have encountered > people who have arousals (mini wake up episodes) as often as 30 to 60 > times > per hour. This could mean that the average length of restful restorative > sleep amounts to one or two minutes at a time throughout the night. This > condition is generally associated with low oxygen levels in the body. As > aviators, we do know the ill effects of hypoxia on the body systems. > These > individuals typically awaken with marked fatigue; often feeling just as > tired when they wake up as when they went to bed. > > Morbid obesity [BMI (body mass index - a mathematical ratio of weight vs > height) > 40 - not just those of us who need to lose a few pounds] has a > strong correlation with sleep problems. > > As a passenger on the flights that I am not able to take my Lancair, I > would > like to hope that the pilot is at his best, having had more than a 1 > minute > stretch of sleep throughout the night. Typically I do not have the option > to > check out the pilot and choose to stay behind if I wanted to. > > The FAA primary mandate is to try to assure the safety of the public. > Though > not all morbidly obese people have sleep apnea, obesity is a significant > risk factor - particularly for the morbidly obese with a BMI > 40. It does > not seem unreasonable to me to apply some screening process to consider > evaluation for pilots who may be at risk. > > It is my understanding that this rule was presented after a commercial > crew > (the captain did have a diagnosis of sleep apnea that was not treated, the > first officer just was tired, but without sleep apnea) BOTH went to sleep > and overflew the destination by 25 miles before they happened to wake up. > > Though none of us appreciate the government poking its nose into our > business, in my opinion it is very logical to assess the morbidly obese > pilot for a condition that may well be very critical to the safety of all > aboard the aircraft. > > Doug Owen > Sent from my iPad > -- > For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html > >