X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:33:16 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from omr-m05.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.79] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6544270 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:42:33 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.143.79; envelope-from=n5276j@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.72]) by omr-m05.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id B978F700000A6 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:41:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-mlb002b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mlb002.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.186.144]) by mtaomg-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 69938E000089 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:41:59 -0400 (EDT) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] running with New E-Mags on IO 360 A1A In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: steve X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D09955C975413C_11E4_6B21_webmail-d265.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 38109-STANDARD Received: from 70.193.193.198 by webmail-d265.sysops.aol.com (205.188.16.97) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:41:59 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8D09955C96BBBB8-11E4-1FD8@webmail-d265.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [70.193.193.198] X-Original-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:41:59 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d2948525fe9273e4e This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8D09955C975413C_11E4_6B21_webmail-d265.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" George, Really interested in the results, I fly LOP all the time with slick mags. = Is there any roughness at all as you go full lean or does it just lost p= ower smoothly as in pulling the mixture all the way out? How do they fit co= mpared to the slicks space wise? Short or long mount? steve alderman N25SA 360 -----Original Message----- From: marv To: lml Sent: Wed, Oct 16, 2013 10:46 pm Subject: [LML] running with New E-Mags on IO 360 A1A Posted for George catalano: > I just installed the new P version of Emags self powered magneto. I have= =20 >only done one flight soI don't really have any data yet but I can tell you= =20 >that it is runs soooo much smoother it's almost weird! In a good way thou= gh. >Like a sewing machine as they say. Almost an indiscernible mag drop as wel= l=20 >as being to run LOP very easily. No roughness as you leanthrough peak. I= =20 >replaced both mags with the P Model and it was very straight forward and= =20 >pretty easy. I am also using the auto plugsas well as the auto wires. > Am planning on more data this weekend and will report on it. >=20 >=20 > George Catalano > george@contessastone.com -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ----------MB_8D09955C975413C_11E4_6B21_webmail-d265.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
George,
 
Really interested in the results, I fly LOP all the time with slick ma= gs.     Is there any roughness at all as you go full le= an or does it just lost power smoothly as in pulling the mixture all the wa= y out? How do they fit compared to the slicks space wise?  Short = or long mount?
 
steve alderman  N25SA  360
-----Original Message-----
From: marv <marv@lancair.net>
To: lml
Sent: Wed, Oct 16, 2013 10:46 pm
Subject: [LML] running with New E-Mags on IO 360 A1A

 ----------MB_8D09955C975413C_11E4_6B21_webmail-d265.sysops.aol.com--