Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #67322
From: Mike Larkin <legacyl2k@gmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Removing vacuum pump?
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:24:40 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Plus you don't waste precious HP running the pump.  This came up when we were looking at the advantages of running electronic ignition vs mags on some of the Redbull airplanes.  Less loss for accessories, more power to the prop...

Mike

4LL


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Craig Berland <cberland@systems3.net> wrote:
I have an all-electric airplane as well and chose to not have any vacuum supplied to the Dukes valve.  The only difference is the rate in which pressurization starts building in the cabin on takeoff roll.  Once airborne, vacuum has no effect on the pressurization system.   I choose to apply power a little more slowly than some pilots.  This prevents any pressurization discomfort and typically I don't need any right brake to hold centerline.  Takeoff distance is not an issue.  If I can land there, I can easily takeoff there.  I know one pilot who has developed an electronic circuit to control a small electric vacuum pump based on the landing gear position.  So there are several options.  In my opinion, keeping the engine driven pump is the least desirable.

Craig Berland
N7VG


Hello Dico,
You will need a vacuum port to the Dukes pressure valve for the pressurization to work correctly, I do not have any gyro instruments either but I needed to install an electric vacuum pump near the Dukes valve
Kamal T
N1104T




--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html



--
Mike Larkin
LarkinAviationConsulting
LegacyL2K@gmail.com
602-770-6054
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster