X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:57:07 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from oproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([74.220.216.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with SMTP id 6496847 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:00:25 -0400 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.220.216.66; envelope-from=danny@n107sd.com Received: (qmail 8914 invoked by uid 0); 30 Sep 2013 21:59:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host295.hostmonster.com) (66.147.240.95) by oproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2013 21:59:47 -0000 Received: from [98.233.210.64] (port=57119 helo=DannysW7PC) by host295.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VQlVL-0006oN-AP for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:59:47 -0600 From: "Danny" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Lancair 320/360 performance and stability X-Original-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:59:20 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <054301cebe28$511764e0$f3462ea0$@n107sd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0544_01CEBE06.CA0A7FD0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-index: AQEQWdFDUSlPX8EHBDJ2pAGUZxz8JptbnLfg Content-language: en-us X-Identified-User: {3234:host295.hostmonster.com:wunderwe:n107sd.com} {sentby:smtp auth 98.233.210.64 authed with danny@n107sd.com} This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0544_01CEBE06.CA0A7FD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Are you getting a full 45 down? Mine have only a complete travel of 26 = deg. Maybe this is something I should change? =20 Danny LNC2-360 Mk-II Nothing is foolproof to the sufficiently talented fool. =20 From: Chris Zavatson [mailto:chris_zavatson@yahoo.com]=20 Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 10:54 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair 320/360 performance and stability =20 So I happened to be looking for something unrelated in the FB manual and came across this on page 10-24: =20 "Lancair flaps are full electric actuated. They are designed to run = from +45 down to -10 up (reflex). Note that the 'faired in position' for = flaps is actually a -7 deg reflex position. ....." =20 My standard build manual is in storage so I could not compare. It would appear the intent was to be able to go to -10 degrees after all. =20 Chris Zavatson N91CZ 360std http://www.n91cz.net/ =20 From: Christian Meier To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:19 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair 320/360 performance and stability =20 Chris, =20 today I made a picture during Cruise with Autopilot at 7500ft with = following configuration: 770 kg 40l in header, 20l in each wing (80l total), 75kg and 83kg for = pilot and co. Flap was on 7=B0 reflex CG 26,20" =20 My design CG is 22,8 - 30,3 from firewall back, horizontal was = installed - 0.6=B0 =20 So it looks like if I would add more reflex than 7=B0, I would need more = down elevator. So the gain with the higher reflex would be lost with the down = elevator.... =20 Christian =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0544_01CEBE06.CA0A7FD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Are you getting a full 45 down?=A0 Mine have = only a complete travel of 26 deg.=A0 Maybe this is something I should = change?

 

Danny

LNC2-360 = Mk-II

Nothing is foolproof to the sufficiently = talented fool.

 

From:= = Chris Zavatson [mailto:chris_zavatson@yahoo.com]
Sent: = Sunday, September 29, 2013 10:54 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair 320/360 = performance and stability

 

So I happened to = be looking for something unrelated in the FB manual and came across this = on page 10-24:

 <= /span>

"Lancair = flaps are full electric actuated.  They are designed to run from = +45 down to -10 up (reflex).  Note that the 'faired in position' = for flaps is actually a -7 deg reflex position. = ....."

 <= /span>

My standard build = manual is in storage so I could not compare.  It would appear the = intent was to be able to go to -10 degrees after = all.

 <= /span>

Chris = Zavatson

N91CZ

360std<= /span>

 <= /span>

F= rom: = Christian Meier <lancair@meier.cc>
To: = lml@lancaironline.net =
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:19 AM
Subject: = [LML] Re: Lancair 320/360 performance and stability

 

Chris,

 

today I made a picture during Cruise with = Autopilot at 7500ft with following = configuration:

770 kg  40l = in header, 20l in each wing (80l total), 75kg and 83kg for pilot and = co.

Flap was on 7=B0 = reflex  CG 26,20"  

My design CG is 22,8  -  30,3 from = firewall back,  horizontal was installed - = 0.6=B0

 

So it looks like if I would add more reflex than = 7=B0, I would need more down = elevator.

So the gain with = the higher reflex would be lost with the down = elevator....

 

Christian

 <= /span>


 

 <= br> 

&= nbsp;

&= nbsp;

&= nbsp;

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0544_01CEBE06.CA0A7FD0--