X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:12:11 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6354157 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:22:19 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.160.52; envelope-from=pjdmiller@gmail.com Received: by mail-pb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id xa12so2684698pbc.39 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:21:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.245.170 with SMTP id xp10mr13387008pbc.41.1372454505256; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:21:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([70.28.245.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vb8sm9753180pbc.11.2013.06.28.14.21.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:21:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [LML] Re: GAMI test References: From: Paul Miller Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-52F543D6-AA8D-44B6-A1C0-21DCE0C14108 X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B146) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <0C660AB6-2C62-4BBD-9E63-661B000EE2A2@gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:21:40 -0600 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-52F543D6-AA8D-44B6-A1C0-21DCE0C14108 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm glad Walter fixed this thread cause I was ready stop going LOP on the io= 550 legacy at full power. I know where that flow is so I just pull it back q= uickly and it goes from 26 to 13gph. Sure kills high CHTs in a heartbeat a= nd saves fuel on long cross country trips. If the plugs and mags are good t= here isn't a shake or misfire...the old champions acted far differently, you= definitely knew when LOP was in play. Paul On 2013-06-27, at 7:04, Walter Atkinson wrote: >=20 >=20 > There is absolutely NO reason not to operate the engine LOP at high power s= ettings. Literally, thousands of pilots are doing so quite successfully. >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-52F543D6-AA8D-44B6-A1C0-21DCE0C14108 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm glad Walter fixed this thread caus= e I was ready stop going LOP on the io550 legacy at full power. I know= where that flow is so I just pull it back quickly and it goes from 26 to 13= gph. Sure kills high CHTs in a heartbeat and saves fuel on long cross= country trips. If the plugs and mags are good there isn't a shake or m= isfire...the old champions acted far differently, you definitely knew when L= OP was in play.

Paul

On 2013-06-27, at 7:04, Wal= ter Atkinson <walter@advanced= pilot.com> wrote:

There is absolutely NO reason not to ope= rate the engine LOP at high power settings. Literally, thousands of pi= lots are doing so quite successfully.

=

= --Apple-Mail-52F543D6-AA8D-44B6-A1C0-21DCE0C14108--