X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:34:25 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from omr-d08.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.207] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6353751 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:47:03 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.109.207; envelope-from=n5276j@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.139]) by omr-d08.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 5DA0470040AA7 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:46:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-mlb003c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mlb003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.186.145]) by mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 2AC68E00008A for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:46:28 -0400 (EDT) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] 360 prop In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: steve X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D0423E8CD279CF_1BA8_BAB2E_webmail-d131.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 37834-STANDARD Received: from 70.196.193.133 by webmail-d131.sysops.aol.com (149.174.18.21) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:46:27 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8D0423E8CC4318F-1BA8-31C87@webmail-d131.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [70.196.193.133] X-Original-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:46:28 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:345769664:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338b51cdcbf46aa4 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8D0423E8CD279CF_1BA8_BAB2E_webmail-d131.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Ed, You meet the Hammers Brothers at Sun-n -fun this year. They say the top spe= eds they achieve are all from fixed pitched props. They have recommend = =20 Catto prop but not the 3 blade. You will suffer big time on take off though= when you try to take-off in Aspen if it is hot and will not be the rocket = on take off you were use to with the MT. =20 Steve Alderman 360 -----Original Message----- From: Ed Gray To: lml Sent: Thu, Jun 27, 2013 10:56 am Subject: [LML] 360 prop What is the best prop for a 360 for max cruise speed? Presently have a MT1= 2 3 blade cs, but considering a fixed pitch 2 blade or a 3 blade Catto. Pl= ane takes off like a rocket, so I don=E2=80=99t really need takeoff pitch. = Almost all use is long distance travel. Engine is Superior IO360, 180 hp.= All opinions welcome and needed. Ed Gray ----------MB_8D0423E8CD279CF_1BA8_BAB2E_webmail-d131.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Ed,
 
You meet the Hammers Brothers at Sun-n -fun this year. They say the to= p speeds they achieve are all from fixed pitched props. They have  rec= ommend   
Catto prop but not the 3 blade. You will suffer big time on take off t= hough when you try to take-off in Aspen if it is hot and will not be the ro= cket on take off you were use to with the MT. 
 
Steve Alderman   360
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Gray <egraylaw@swbell.net>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Thu, Jun 27, 2013 10:56 am
Subject: [LML] 360 prop

Wha= t is the best prop for a 360 for max cruise speed?  Presently have a M= T12 3 blade cs, but considering a fixed pitch 2 blade or a 3 blade Catto.&n= bsp; Plane takes off like a rocket, so I don=E2=80=99t really need takeoff = pitch.  Almost all use is long distance travel.  Engine is Superi= or IO360, 180 hp.  All opinions welcome and needed.  Ed Gray
----------MB_8D0423E8CD279CF_1BA8_BAB2E_webmail-d131.sysops.aol.com--