Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #65744
From: steve <n5276j@aol.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fuel flow
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:44:16 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Angier,
 
You should have kept the VM1000. I have had no problems with it, but then again THANKS for selling it to me.8-)
 
Steve Alderman  trouble free  at 185 TT
-----Original Message-----
From: Greenbacks, UnLtd. <N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET>
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wed, Jun 5, 2013 1:14 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: Fuel flow

The 550 mile flight this morning from KBVY-KRKD-KEPM-KBVY was crystal clear VFR 
with 195kts TAS, 5500ft, 24"MP, 2400RPM, 8.2GPH, 25ÂșLOP
and 22.5MPG...not too shabby for this little pip-sqweak of a plane. 

The good news is that my continuing issue with erratic MVP-50 fuel flow readings
has now been identified but the solution will be a real pain to fix. Turning off 
the ALT instantly caused FF readings to become rock solid! Go figure.
I'll have to remove the cowl in order to refresh my aging memory on how the ALT 
output lead is plumbed but at some point it must be too close to the FF cable. 
After the fact it sounds like common sense but don't run any sensor wires aft 
from the engine compartment in the same wire bundle which includes the ALT lead. 
Short of relocating wires, do we have an electrical wizard here with a more 
elegant solution? I suppose that any time I want to see accurate fuel data, I 
could simply shut off the ALT for a few seconds. :-)

Angier Ames
N4ZQ
35hrs
   
--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster