X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:44:16 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from omr-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.202] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTP id 6309797 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:35:11 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.109.202; envelope-from=n5276j@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.77]) by omr-d05.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 8C63470002C65 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 17:34:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-mld004a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mld004.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.122.82]) by mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 5BFB3E000082 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 17:34:35 -0400 (EDT) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fuel flow In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: steve X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D0304B9B89F21F_1BCC_1350F_webmail-vm009.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 37776-STANDARD Received: from 70.193.211.205 by webmail-vm009.sysops.aol.com (64.12.255.130) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:34:34 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8D0304B9B7E0B3F-1BCC-52BF@webmail-vm009.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [70.193.211.205] X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 17:34:35 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:462010592:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d294d51afaeeb1c22 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8D0304B9B89F21F_1BCC_1350F_webmail-vm009.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Angier, The VM1000 sensors all use shielded wires as Grayhawk mentions and are all = rock solid.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Sky2high To: lml Sent: Wed, Jun 5, 2013 2:25 pm Subject: [LML] Re: Fuel flow Angier, =20 The wires from the sensor should be shielded (ground connected at one end o= f shield). =20 Grayhawk =20 In a message dated 6/5/2013 2:14:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time, N4ZQ@VERIZO= N.NET writes: The 550 mile flight this morning from KBVY-KRKD-KEPM-KBVY was crystal cle= ar VFR with 195kts TAS, 5500ft, 24"MP, 2400RPM, 8.2GPH, 25=C2=BALOP and 22.5MPG...not too shabby for this little pip-sqweak of a plane.=20 The good news is that my continuing issue with erratic MVP-50 fuel flow r= eadings has now been identified but the solution will be a real pain to fix. Turn= ing off the ALT instantly caused FF readings to become rock solid! Go fig= ure. I'll have to remove the cowl in order to refresh my aging memory on how t= he ALT output lead is plumbed but at some point it must be too close to t= he FF cable. After the fact it sounds like common sense but don't run any= sensor wires aft from the engine compartment in the same wire bundle whi= ch includes the ALT lead. Short of relocating wires, do we have an electr= ical wizard here with a more elegant solution? I suppose that any time I = want to see accurate fuel data, I could simply shut off the ALT for a few= seconds. :-) Angier Ames N4ZQ 35hrs =20 -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml ----------MB_8D0304B9B89F21F_1BCC_1350F_webmail-vm009.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Angier,
 
The VM1000 sensors all use shielded wires as Grayhawk mentions and are= all rock solid.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sky2high <Sky2high@aol.com>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wed, Jun 5, 2013 2:25 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: Fuel flow

Angier,
 
The wires from the sensor should be shielded (ground connected at one = end=20 of shield).
 
Grayhawk
 
In a message dated 6/5/2013 2:14:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET writes:
= The 550=20 mile flight this morning from KBVY-KRKD-KEPM-KBVY was crystal clear VFR w= ith=20 195kts TAS, 5500ft, 24"MP, 2400RPM, 8.2GPH, 25=C2=BALOP
and 22.5MPG...not too=20 shabby for this little pip-sqweak of a plane.

The good news is that my=20 continuing issue with erratic MVP-50 fuel flow readings
has now been=20 identified but the solution will be a real pain to fix. Turning off the A= LT=20 instantly caused FF readings to become rock solid! Go figure.
I'll have to=20 remove the cowl in order to refresh my aging memory on how the ALT output= lead=20 is plumbed but at some point it must be too close to the FF cable. After = the=20 fact it sounds like common sense but don't run any sensor wires aft from = the=20 engine compartment in the same wire bundle which includes the ALT lead. S= hort=20 of relocating wires, do we have an electrical wizard here with a more ele= gant=20 solution? I suppose that any time I want to see accurate fuel data, I cou= ld=20 simply shut off the ALT for a few seconds. :-)

Angier=20 Ames
N4ZQ
35hrs
  
--
For archives and unsub=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
=
----------MB_8D0304B9B89F21F_1BCC_1350F_webmail-vm009.sysops.aol.com--