X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:44:16 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm41-vm6.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([67.195.87.93] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6309906 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 18:33:09 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=67.195.87.93; envelope-from=chris_zavatson@yahoo.com Received: from [98.137.12.60] by nm41.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2013 22:32:33 -0000 Received: from [208.71.42.194] by tm5.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2013 22:32:33 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp205.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jun 2013 22:32:33 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 695904.89309.bm@smtp205.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: kr0xJnAVM1kBbqxEXBvJYahcegPBOwl147aA4qPJAOzWWpb xQMReqz9NGdVjvrF5_H52OznRyYTKsZlGJlBojMO9IJhNanr7EDWXjhkSQ2Z 1AHmLBuZaYdroSq.Y0Sks80z37iCI1vQM32Z.501iKJKWLmU5_R64oV.sPq1 EI7e4nuDECxfes_fn9Ut.MeQ69t2C78mEtUQJZgvPfDmr39yNh0kvf3IfLM3 Jd8aflROled_PX6FjMwjPIvFekoIgxLO_cgYIJkRx6AGwz5A2YGqzepFCoFh zibkKTMIGf_aPoH6Q.KEFEK48HmYn5TQgg5.btJKsW70gaaPeLsUzQHyv3U4 89dtqfkkW5Zbh6UiFBttTZ2X06yok1DXX3ZmhnXAZpZt6.uAyUBLy9tdi5Hx ykqSDgbrqziGpoea00X6iBqfnPhtiY1C0o1O.TEcuJGtM4Qp9w.SyN8VE1vj NdkejRvQ8Iaqa.L57f0F9bGaxYr.py0uBzinq9h1HhvJK_eVvAhNBmfNXDAf 2KQOdsU.TkB3zaBY4Zdos8FQQMSK1n6niRLWDXfySiZYe7uZZqH9rt3ebHte 96C5XcJEDmexbCNQB8M6qFhO81Bq5Hc5XwVg2Dr3gbz5tXe.H2w-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 076hgjCswBC.G6e0vm7vgvZ9JJ0zmeBo_Oyw X-Rocket-Received: from [10.24.77.46] (chris_zavatson@198.228.213.123 with ) by smtp205.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 05 Jun 2013 15:32:33 -0700 PDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair 360 CHT during climb References: From: Chris Zavatston Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-7BC42D58-601F-4F2C-BDDE-BF0361060E1A X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <2F1D6D03-BBAA-421D-97C4-B613E0988AAE@yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 12:32:28 -1000 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-7BC42D58-601F-4F2C-BDDE-BF0361060E1A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Gilles, It sounds like your cooling in cruise is doing quite well. Given your OAT a= nd elevation it might be worth checking things mentioned by other such as ma= g timing etc. just to be sure. Chris=20 Sent from my spiffy iPhone On Jun 2, 2013, at 8:08 AM, gilles.canese@sfr.fr wrote: > Thanks for the answers >=20 > Meanwhile I will consider climb out at 135 kts and will check the baffling= and timing on mags >=20 > Diificult to richen more at take off, I have already 17,2 GPH at full powe= r. At the end, the excursion above 400=C2=B0F is short, only after take at f= ull power >=20 > Concerning the RV's I think that there is much more space between engine a= nd the cowling that makes difference =20 >=20 > For Chris, in cruise all CHT's are below 350 =C2=B0F and LOP between 305 a= nd 335 =C2=B0F The airfield altiude is 600 ft and OAT arround to 15=C2=B0C >=20 > Thank you to everybody for all comments and help >=20 > Gilles >=20 > =20 >=20 >=20 > Cet e-mail est solidaire : un clic ici =3D un don pour l=E2=80=99associati= on Action contre la Faim >=20 > -- Envoy=C3=A9 via mailforgood >=20 >=20 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > Message du : 01/06/2013 23:40 > De : "Chris Zavatson " > A : lml@lancaironline.net > Copie =C3=A0 :=20 > Sujet : [LML] Re: Lancair 360 CHT during climb >=20 >=20 > Gilles, > There are many 360s out there not cooling as well as they should. So even= if it is 'normal', it may not be desirable. > Are the values you listed peak or momentary, or are they sustained or aver= age values in the climb. Also, what is the elevation at take-off and OAT. = Are these values from the first takeoff of the day or after a short stop so= mewhere with everything still hot. Perhaps a better evaluation could be mad= e at a steady state point of wide open throttle cruise leaned for best power= .=20 > =20 > Chris Zavatson =20 > N91CZ > 360std > www.N91CZ.net >=20 > From: Gilles Canese > To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 4:44 PM > Subject: [LML] Lancair 360 CHT during climb >=20 > Hello=20 > I am a new Lancair 360 owner and I have a question about CHT during climbi= ng At full power after take off, CHT 's are between 380 and 415 oF, is it n= ormal for a 360? >=20 > Thanks for the answers=20 >=20 > Gilles=20 >=20 >=20 > Envoy=C3=A9 de mon iPad > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-7BC42D58-601F-4F2C-BDDE-BF0361060E1A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Gilles,
It sound= s like your cooling in cruise is doing quite well.  Given your OAT and e= levation it might be worth checking things mentioned by other such as mag ti= ming etc. just to be sure.
Chris 

Sent from my spiffy i= Phone

On Jun 2, 2013, at 8:08 AM, gilles.canese@sfr.fr wrote:

Thanks for the answers

Meanwhile I will consider climb out at 135 kts and will= check the baffling and timing on mags

Diific= ult to richen more at take off, I have already 17,2 GPH at full power. At th= e end, the excursion above 400=C2=B0F is short,  only after take at ful= l power

Concerning the RV's I think that ther= e is much more space between engine and the cowling that  makes differe= nce  

For Chris, in cruise all CHT's are b= elow 350 =C2=B0F and LOP between 305 and 335 =C2=B0F The airfield altiude is= 600 ft and OAT arround to 15=C2=B0C

Thank you= to everybody for all comments and help

Gilles=

 



=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D

Message du : 01/06/2013 23:40
De : "Chris Zavatson " <chris_zavatson@yahoo.com>
A= : lml@lancaironline.net
Cop= ie =C3=A0 :
Sujet : [LML] Re: Lancair 360 CHT during climb


<= div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;= font-size: 12pt; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
Gilles,
There are many 360s= out there not cooling as well as they should.  So even if it is 'norma= l', it may not be desirable.
Are the values you listed peak or momen= tary, or are they sustained or average values in the climb.  Also, what= is the elevation at take-off  and OAT.  Are these values fro= m the first takeoff of the day or after a short stop somewhere with eve= rything still hot.  Perhaps a better&nb= sp;evaluation could be made at a steady state point of wide open throttle cr= uise leaned for best power. 
 
=
Chris Zavatson&nbs= p;   
N91CZ
360std

From: Gilles Canese <gilles.canese@sfr.fr>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent= : Wednesday, May 29, 2013 4:44 PM
Subject: [LML] Lancair 360 CHT during climb
<= /div>

Hello
I am a new Lancair 360 owner and I have a question about CHT d= uring climbing At full power after take off,  CHT 's are between 380 an= d 415 oF, is it normal for a 360?

Thanks for the answers

Gill= es


Envoy=C3=A9 de mon iPad
--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html


= --Apple-Mail-7BC42D58-601F-4F2C-BDDE-BF0361060E1A--