Return-Path: Received: from mail.akos.net ([209.194.60.5]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA28393 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 19:20:50 -0400 Received: from home.akos.net (root@home.akos.net [209.194.60.20]) by mail.akos.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA21114 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 19:13:08 -0400 Received: from akos.net (ppp01.npr2.akos.net [209.194.57.66]) by home.akos.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA19677 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 19:18:09 -0400 Message-ID: <360C24E4.F9CD9CC0@akos.net> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 19:19:01 -0400 From: Tom Giddings To: Lancair Mail List Subject: Carbon fiber/e/glass/s/glass X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> My neighbor and friend is building a 320.It is an older FB with the small tail short nose ect.I convinced him to get the long mount(which he did)His kit was partially completed by a previous(disenchanted)builder and has the small tail mostly done but not bonded to the fuselage.He does not like how the tail is constructed and does not want to use it.SOOO starts the tail controversy(BIG ?or small?)He has decided to go with the MKII tail option (good choice)We discussed the fuselage strengthening procedure Martin Holman recomends.I said ,it can,t hurt anything.He then says he wants to do the bids in carbon fiber.I said you cannot!!!!Also a lot of information has been on this LML.Of which I felt was valid.He said"Well if that is the case then why is Lancair selling a carbon fiber retrofit to glue onto E/Glass.Is that not the same thing?The little guy has a point.What say all of you? Tom Giddings 360TM