X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:40:03 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc3-s32.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.107] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTP id 6301360 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 31 May 2013 22:41:40 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.116.107; envelope-from=gary21sn@hotmail.com Received: from BLU172-DS12 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s32.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 31 May 2013 19:41:06 -0700 X-TMN: [ArNhe4FSgJbAcRfSco9K+Dt3aGpLAVud] X-Originating-Email: [gary21sn@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: gary21sn@hotmail.com From: "Gary Edwards" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: Lancair 360 CHT during climb In-Reply-To: X-Original-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 19:41:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_038F_01CE5E36.CB141920" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V10.50.0008.2100 Seal-Send-Time: Fri, 31 May 2013 19:41:06 -0700 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2013 02:41:06.0897 (UTC) FILETIME=[7777AC10:01CE5E71] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_038F_01CE5E36.CB141920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looks like at 350 we better stop flying. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Colyn Case=20 To: Lancair Mailing List=20 Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 7:15 PM Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair 360 CHT during climb 350 is 77%=20 415 is 44% On May 31, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Gary Edwards wrote: Looks like at 350 we better stop flying. Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: Craig Berland To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 10:26 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair 360 CHT during climb With my limited patience, I cannot seem to find the strength vs temp = charts for various aluminum alloys. Here is some data for 2124-T851. As I remember the cast alloy for our cylinder heads is worse than = this and the curve gets steeper as you increase the temp past 400 degF. Look at the second chart carefully and then consider cruising with = 420 degF CHT=92s. Craig Berland =20 ------=_NextPart_000_038F_01CE5E36.CB141920 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Looks like at 350 we better stop flying.
----- Original Message -----
From: Colyn Case
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 7:15 = PM
Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair 360 = CHT during=20 climb

350 is 77%=20
415 is 44%


On May 31, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Gary Edwards wrote:
Looks like at 350 we better stop flying.
 
Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: Craig Berland
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 = 10:26 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair 360 CHT = during=20 climb

With=20 my limited patience, I cannot seem to find the strength vs temp = charts for=20 various aluminum alloys.  Here is some data for=20 2124-T851.
As=20 I remember the cast alloy for our cylinder heads is worse than this = and the=20 curve gets steeper as you increase the temp past 400=20 degF.
Look=20 at the second chart carefully and then consider cruising with 420 = degF=20 CHT=92s.
Craig=20 Berland
 
<image002.png>
<image001.png>



------=_NextPart_000_038F_01CE5E36.CB141920--