Return-Path: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from [207.79.152.5] by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2
          release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with SMTP
          id AAA29282 for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>;
          Wed, 23 Sep 1998 12:08:24 -0400
Received: from CDIM-PTS-MAIL by [207.79.152.5]
          via smtpd (for truman.olsusa.com [205.245.9.2]) with SMTP; 23 Sep 1998 16:08:23 UT
Received: by cdim-pts-mail.ports-va.marine.cdicorp.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52)
	id <01BDE6EA.7DDE0540@cdim-pts-mail.ports-va.marine.cdicorp.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 12:05:44 -0400
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=CDI_Corporation%l=CDIM-PTS-MAIL-980923160542Z-4767@cdim-pts-mail.ports-va.marine.cdicorp.com>
From: "Rumburg, William" <wrumburg@cdicorp.com>
To: 'Lynda Frantz' <LFrantz@compuserve.com>, "'INTERNET:lancair.list@olsusa.com'" <lancair.list@olsusa.com>
Subject: RE: Battery capaticance
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 12:05:42 -0400
X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Mime-Version: 1.0

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
Jim...

  Your theory must be correct, as demonstrated by actual performance. 
However,
wouldn't it be easier to connect only the intercom power lead directly 
to the battery
terminal yielding the same effect, yet be much easier ???


                                                            Bill 
Rumburg
                                                            N430WR