X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:15:44 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from a.mail.sonic.net ([64.142.16.245] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c1) with ESMTPS id 5797468 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 07 Oct 2012 14:42:19 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.142.16.245; envelope-from=superdmp@sonic.net Received: from Burner (rrcs-71-43-149-195.se.biz.rr.com [71.43.149.195]) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q97Ifj92018568 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 11:41:45 -0700 From: "David M. Powell CRFA" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Piston oil cooling jets X-Original-Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 14:41:06 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac2kqaK3Yp+JvORpQpauKH+buRu1kwAEaoqw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 Before I purchased my 360, I went for a demonstration flight with another 360 owner. He had been having high engine temperatures and installed a small vent extension below the engine compartment. It increased the airflow around the engine and he said solved his heat problem. My 360 seems not to have a heat problem so I haven't bothered with It myself; but he seemed pretty pleased with his results. Good luck to you, Dave David Powell CRFA superdmp@sonic.net (386) 868-5858 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of N20087 Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 12:34 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Piston oil cooling jets > Folks This is addressed to the hard core engine experts on the forum. I would love your feedback on this I am considering having my io360 crankcase modified so that I can install piston cooling jets which are standard in 200hp engines. The reason being, I have had to take aircraft out of service twice, once at 80 hrs and now at 160 due to lousy break-in and high CHTs. I have done all the obvious stuff such as plenum, timing, plugs, flowed the fuel servo to the rich side, baffles etc.. I am running 9:1 eci cerminil cylinders and they will hit 430 on climb out. They went to 450 twice in the initial break-in. They will run 370 in 75% cruise and 340 lop All this aside, the pistons at 80 hrs (both times) were coated in dark varnish under the crown and the top of the crowns were heavily carbonized from oil blowback I am just getting tired of it and don't want to pul the engine apart again anytime soon after this downturn So,,,I am wondering if anybody has any experience or data concerning the cooling benefits of the piston oil nozzles. Ie is it 5 degrees or 20+ Also, I am debating whether to split the crankcase myself or take the closed case (jugs and every accessory removed) with con rods still attached to the local shop and have them split the case, do the machining and reassemble. The shop is very very reputable but of course the cost will be higher if I get them to do the breakdown and reassembly As another cooling remediation measure I was thinking of opening up the cowl inlets to 4 inches but a little reluctant due to the increased drag and limited benefit. I added an electric cowl flap by the way and achieved only a 2 degree CHT improvement in climb at 130 knots Go figure! Again, any feedback on my plan here would appreciated Thanks in advance Tom -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html