X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 10:33:04 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.32] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c1) with ESMTP id 5789034 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 08:10:10 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.62.32; envelope-from=rob@robmurawski.com Received: from omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6AjE1k00517dt5G53C9gWg; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:09:40 +0000 Received: from wintermute.rob-home.local. ([76.120.176.49]) by omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6C5M1k00l14KV5G3ZC5Ngb; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:05:22 +0000 Received: from LAPSE (wintermute.rob-home.local [192.168.0.5]) by wintermute.rob-home.local. (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q92C4JSn004344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:04:21 -0400 From: "Rob Murawski" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: FAA certification X-Original-Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:05:23 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <001c01cda096$38a776d0$a9f66470$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac2gkmcoeLGGHmgJQ+Cz7yTUbUE4iwAArDiw Content-Language: en-us X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: q92C4JSn004344 X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.214, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, TVD_RCVD_SINGLE 1.21, WEIRD_PORT 0.00) X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner-From: rob@robmurawski.com MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1349784261.96942@2ciRyAah/2AIFZM4Nmr7Jg First, I'm not sure why the inspection would have to come to a halt = because of equipment for IFR flight. The operating limitations, when issued, = should say: =93After completion of phase I flight testing, unless appropriately = equipped for night and/or instrument flight in accordance with =A7 91.205, this aircraft is to be operated under VFR, day only.=94 The flight testing must be performed in VFR day only conditions. When = that is completed, if your aircraft is equipped per 91.205, you may fly in = other than VFR, day-only conditions. For IFR flight, paragraph (d) of 91.205 lists the required equipment = that we all know and love: (d) Instrument flight rules. For IFR flight, the following instruments = and equipment are required: (1) Instruments and equipment specified in paragraph (b) of this = section, and, for night flight, instruments and equipment specified in paragraph = (c) of this section. (2) Two-way radio communication and navigation equipment suitable for = the route to be flown. (3) Gyroscopic rate-of-turn indicator, except on the following aircraft: (i) Airplanes with a third attitude instrument system usable through = flight attitudes of 360 degrees of pitch and roll and installed in accordance = with the instrument requirements prescribed in =A7121.305(j) of this chapter; = and (ii) Rotorcraft with a third attitude instrument system usable through flight attitudes of =B180 degrees of pitch and =B1120 degrees of roll = and installed in accordance with =A729.1303(g) of this chapter. (4) Slip-skid indicator. (5) Sensitive altimeter adjustable for barometric pressure. (6) A clock displaying hours, minutes, and seconds with a sweep-second pointer or digital presentation. (7) Generator or alternator of adequate capacity. (8) Gyroscopic pitch and bank indicator (artificial horizon). (9) Gyroscopic direction indicator (directional gyro or equivalent).=20 I do not see secondary static source anywhere in that list. Sure, there = are people who want redundancy in various systems, but the FARs do not = require that. =20 If you are an EAA member, see: http://members.eaa.org/home/homebuilders/faq/Equipping%20a%20Homebuilt%20= for %20IFR%20operations.html -Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of > Greenbacks, UnLtd. > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 7:38 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: FAA certification >=20 > Last Friday and 4hrs into the inspection, the process came to a > screeching halt when I was unable to show an alternate static source > was installed. The inspector wanted to be sure 4ZQ had all the > equipment required for IFR flight. Needless to say, I was none too > pleased but saluted and said yes sir, right away sir since his return > visit is scheduled for this coming Friday. I have no particular > interest in arm-wreastling with the guy but can one of you, just one = of > you point to an FAA legal requirement that my little pip squeak of a > 360 have an alternate static source to be legal for IFR? >=20 > He had some long checklist of items, presumably from within the bowels > of the FAA, but then he completely overlooked the missing cotter pin = at > the left main axle. >=20 > Angier Ames > N4ZQ > -- > For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html