|
Thanks Doug good lesson for me to remember
From:
| "Douglas Brunner" <douglasbrunner@earthlink.net>
|
To:
| lml@lancaironline.net
|
Date:
| 06/04/2012 09:49 AM
|
Subject:
| [LML] Re: Speaking of defrost
|
Sent by:
| "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net> |
My presumption is that it
came from the defrost. When I built my plane, I put in a duct system
beneath the glare shield that directed hot air up to the canopy. In
retrospect, I think I made it too effective.
I used to leave the defrost
on long after the canopy had cleared. I had a long trip “through
the soup” in Western Maryland, Pennsylvania and Ohio during which I believe
the defrost was on the whole time. Immediately after that leg the
canopy showed some significant cracking/crazing.
Now I switch immediately
from defrost to heat (or off) as soon as the canopy is clear.
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]
On Behalf Of larry.eversmeyer@faa.gov
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:57 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Speaking of defrost
Doug, Where did all of the heat that damage your canopy come from?
Larry Eversmeyer
still building Legacy
Yes, I need defrost – I fly out of KMTN in the Baltimore area.
I would suggest judicious use of defrost. Recently had to replace
my canopy due to damage from excessive heat.
|
|