Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #62245
From: Douglas Brunner <douglasbrunner@earthlink.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Speaking of defrost
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:48:49 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

My presumption is that it came from the defrost.  When I built my plane, I put in a duct system beneath the glare shield that directed hot air up to the canopy.  In retrospect, I think I made it too effective.

 

I used to leave the defrost on long after the canopy had cleared.  I had a long trip “through the soup” in Western Maryland, Pennsylvania and Ohio during which I believe the defrost was on the whole time.  Immediately after that leg the canopy showed some significant cracking/crazing. 

 

Now I switch immediately from defrost to heat (or off) as soon as the canopy is clear.

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of larry.eversmeyer@faa.gov
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:57 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Speaking of defrost

 


Doug, Where did all of the heat that damage your canopy come from?

Larry Eversmeyer
still building Legacy





Yes, I need defrost – I fly out of KMTN in the Baltimore area.
 
I would suggest judicious use of defrost.  Recently had to replace my canopy due to damage from excessive heat.
 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster